» Articles » PMID: 11694930

Donor-site Morbidity and Anterior Knee Problems After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autografts

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2001 Nov 6
PMID 11694930
Citations 155
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The authors review the current knowledge on donor site-related problems after using different types of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and make recommendations on minimizing late donor-site problems. Postoperative donor-site morbidity and anterior knee pain following ACL surgery may result in substantial impairment for patients. The selection of graft, surgical technique, and rehabilitation program can affect the severity of pain that patients experience. The loss or disturbance of anterior sensitivity caused by intraoperative injury to the infrapatellar nerve(s) in conjunction with patellar tendon harvest is correlated with donor-site discomfort and an inability to kneel and knee-walk. The patellar tendon at the donor site has significant clinical, radiographic, and histologic abnormalities 2 years after harvest of its central third. Donor-site discomfort correlates poorly with radiographic and histologic findings after the use of patellar tendon autografts. The use of hamstring tendon autografts appears to cause less postoperative donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems than the use of patellar tendon autografts. There also appears to be a regrowth of the hamstring tendons within 2 years of the harvesting procedure. There is little known about the effect on the donor site of harvesting fascia lata and quadriceps tendon autografts. Efforts should be made to spare the infrapatellar nerve(s) during ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts. Reharvesting the patellar tendon cannot be recommended due to significant clinical, radiographic, and histologic abnormalities 2 years after harvesting its central third. It is important to regain full range of motion and strength after the use of any type of autograft to avoid future anterior knee problems. If randomized controlled trials show that the long-term laxity measurements following ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts are equal to those of patellar tendon autografts, we recommend the use of hamstring tendon autografts because there are fewer donor-site problems.

Citing Articles

Integrating Modern Technologies into Traditional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Engineering.

Sopilidis A, Stamatopoulos V, Giannatos V, Taraviras G, Panagopoulos A, Taraviras S Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851313 PMC: 11762506. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010039.


Complications in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Figueroa D, Gonzalez W, Figueroa L, Figueroa F, Vaisman A J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 61():102876.

PMID: 39816721 PMC: 11731265. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102876.


A randomized controlled trial on oblique incisions for ACL reconstruction: Minimizing sensory deficit without compromising outcome.

Duraiswamy G, Ashraf M, Paul E, K S, Rajan D J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 60:102865.

PMID: 39759468 PMC: 11697362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102865.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair Using Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Combined with Lateral Extra-articular Augmentation: A Case Report and Technical Note.

Brunner M, Hax J, Leuthard L, Preiss S, Worlicek M Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68599.

PMID: 39371900 PMC: 11450426. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68599.


Modified Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Kantrowitz D, Darden C, Haunschild E, Gladstone J, Anthony S Arthrosc Tech. 2024; 13(9):103034.

PMID: 39308585 PMC: 11411291. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103034.