» Articles » PMID: 31666047

Initiation is Recognized As a Fundamental Early Phase of Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT): Qualitative Interviews with Researchers and Research Users in IKT Partnerships

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Nov 1
PMID 31666047
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Health care researcher-research user partnerships, referred to as integrated knowledge translation (IKT), have been adopted on an international basis, and are an effective means of co-generating and implementing evidence into policy and practice. Prior research suggests that an initiation period is essential for establishing functional partnerships. To characterize IKT initiation and describe determinants of IKT initiation success, this study explored IKT initiation processes, enablers, and barriers among researchers and research users involved in IKT partnerships.

Methods: A descriptive qualitative approach was used compliant with COREQ standards. Canadian researchers and research users in research collaborations were identified on publicly-available directories and web sites, and referred by those interviewed. They were asked to describe how partnerships were initiated, influencing factors, the length of initiation, and interventions needed to support initiation. Sampling was concurrent with data collection and analysis to achieve thematic saturation. Data were analyzed using constant comparative technique by all members of the research team.

Results: In total, 22 individuals from 6 provinces were interviewed (9 researchers, 11 research users, 2 connectors). They confirmed that IKT initiation is a distinct early phase of partnerships. The period ranged from 6 months to 2 years for 75.0% of participants in pre-existing partnerships, to 6 years for newly-formed partnerships. High-level themes were: Newly identifying and securing partners is an intensive process; Processes and activities take place over a protracted period through multiple interactions; Identifying and engaging committed partners is reliant on funding; and Partnership building is challenged by maintaining continuity and enthusiasm. Participants underscored the need for an IKT partner matching forum, IKT initiation toolkit, and funding for non-research activities required during IKT initiation to establish functional researcher-research user partnerships. Themes were largely similar regardless of participant years of experience with IKT or being involved in a new versus pre-existing partnership.

Conclusions: IKT initiation is a recognized and important early phase of IKT that establishes functional partnerships, and once established, ongoing partnership for subsequent projects is likely. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate approaches recommended by participants for stimulating IKT initiation.

Citing Articles

Partnered health research in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of perceptions among researchers and knowledge users involved in funded projects between 2011 and 2019.

Sibley K, Crockett L, Gainforth H, Graham I, Hoekstra F, Healey J Health Res Policy Syst. 2025; 23(1):28.

PMID: 40033392 PMC: 11874841. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-025-01299-8.


Developing, implementing, and monitoring tailored strategies for integrated knowledge translation in five sub-Saharan African countries.

Sell K, Jessani N, Mesfin F, Rehfuess E, Rohwer A, Delobelle P Health Res Policy Syst. 2023; 21(1):91.

PMID: 37667309 PMC: 10478471. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01038-x.


The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) Bridge Process: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Address Priority Health Issues and Increase Collaborative Research in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Kontak J, Grant A, Jeffers E, Boulos L, Ricketts J, Davies M Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023; 12:6901.

PMID: 37579467 PMC: 10125170. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6901.


A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.

Tittlemier B, Cooper J, Steliga D, Woodgate R, Sibley K Health Res Policy Syst. 2022; 20(1):69.

PMID: 35717196 PMC: 9206347. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00877-4.


Fit for purpose. Co-production of complex behavioural interventions. A practical guide and exemplar of co-producing a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for people with stroke.

Ramage E, Burke M, Galloway M, Graham I, Janssen H, Marsden D Health Res Policy Syst. 2022; 20(1):2.

PMID: 34980156 PMC: 8722305. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00790-2.


References
1.
Graham I, Tetroe J . Getting evidence into policy and practice: perspective of a health research funder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 18(1):46-50. PMC: 2651211. View

2.
Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C, Wilkinson J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Baker R . Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016; 11:17. PMC: 4748518. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0380-z. View

3.
Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, OBrien M, Grimshaw J . Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (8):CD000125. PMC: 4172331. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4. View

4.
Newton M, Estabrooks C, Norton P, Birdsell J, Adewale A, Thornley R . Health researchers in Alberta: an exploratory comparison of defining characteristics and knowledge translation activities. Implement Sci. 2007; 2:1. PMC: 1781466. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-1. View

5.
Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A, Sprung J . Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 37(15):1390-400. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963705. View