» Articles » PMID: 35717196

A Scoping Review to Identify and Describe the Characteristics of Theories, Models and Frameworks of Health Research Partnerships

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Jun 18
PMID 35717196
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Engaging users of health research, namely knowledge users, as partners in the research process may to lead to evidence that is more relevant to the users. This may optimize the uptake of evidence in healthcare practice, resulting in improved health outcomes or more efficient healthcare systems. However, barriers to involving knowledge users in the research process exist. Theories, models and frameworks may help guide the process of involving knowledge users and address barriers to engaging with knowledge users in research; however, there is little evidence identifying or describing the theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.

Objectives: Identify and describe theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships. Report on concepts of knowledge user engagement represented in identified theories, models and frameworks.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review. Database (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PCORI) and ancestry and snowball searches were utilized. Included articles were written in English, published between January 2005 and June 2021, specific to health, a research partnership, and referred to a theory, model or framework. No critical appraisal was conducted. We developed a coding framework to extract details related to the publication (e.g. country, year) and theory, model or framework (e.g. intended users, theoretical underpinning, methodology, methods of development, purpose, concepts of knowledge user engagement). One reviewer conducted data extraction. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were utilized to report the results.

Results: We identified 21 874 articles in screening. Thirty-nine models or frameworks were included in data analysis, but no theory. Two models or frameworks (5%) were underpinned by theory. Literature review was the method (n = 11, 28%) most frequently used to develop a model or framework. Guiding or managing a partnership was the most frequently reported purpose of the model/framework (n = 14, 36%). The most represented concept of knowledge user engagement was principles/values (n = 36, 92%).

Conclusions: The models and frameworks identified could be utilized by researchers and knowledge users to inform aspects of a health research partnership, such as guidance or implementation of a partnership. Future research evaluating the quality and applicability of the models and frameworks is necessary to help partners decide which model or framework to implement.

Citing Articles

Partnered health research in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of perceptions among researchers and knowledge users involved in funded projects between 2011 and 2019.

Sibley K, Crockett L, Gainforth H, Graham I, Hoekstra F, Healey J Health Res Policy Syst. 2025; 23(1):28.

PMID: 40033392 PMC: 11874841. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-025-01299-8.


Outcomes of an integrated knowledge translation approach in five African countries: a mixed-methods comparative case study.

Sell K, Rehfuess E, Osuret J, Bayiga-Zziwa E, Geremew B, Pfadenhauer L Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):162.

PMID: 39658798 PMC: 11629502. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01256-x.


Community-engaged research: Bringing the science of developmental psychopathology into the real world.

Parade S, Jennings E, Huffhines L, Rojo-Wissar D, Caron C, Berger B Dev Psychopathol. 2024; 36(5):2349-2356.

PMID: 39363709 PMC: 11717648. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579424001020.


The effectiveness of knowledge-sharing techniques and approaches in research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR): a systematic review.

Baxter H, Bearne L, Stone T, Thomas C, Denholm R, Redwood S Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):41.

PMID: 38566127 PMC: 10988883. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01127-5.


Partnering with patients and caregivers to enrich research and care in kidney disease: values and strategies.

Cazzolli R, Sluiter A, Guha C, Huuskes B, Wong G, Craig J Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(Suppl 1):i57-i68.

PMID: 37711636 PMC: 10497378. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad063.


References
1.
Di Lorito C, Godfrey M, Dunlop M, Bosco A, Pollock K, der Wardt V . Adding to the knowledge on Patient and Public Involvement: Reflections from an experience of co-research with carers of people with dementia. Health Expect. 2020; 23(3):691-706. PMC: 7321727. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13049. View

2.
Bowen S, Botting I, Graham I, MacLeod M, De Moissac D, Harlos K . Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to "Re-imagine" Research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019; 8(12):684-699. PMC: 6885864. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66. View

3.
Davis D, Taylor-Vaisey A . Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997; 157(4):408-16. PMC: 1227916. View

4.
Jull J, Davidson L, Dungan R, Nguyen T, Woodward K, Graham I . A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):211. PMC: 6869315. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0838-1. View

5.
Gousse Y, McFarlane D, Fraser M, Joseph M, Alli B, Council-George M . Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Shared Community-Academic HIV Prevention Intervention. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019; 12(4):451-461. PMC: 6373485. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0070. View