» Articles » PMID: 31642639

[Prevalence Among Males from the General Population of Agents Responsible of Not Ulcerative Genital Tract Infections, Assisted in Specialized Care]

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2019 Oct 24
PMID 31642639
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Male genital infections are a major problem due to their high frequency and morbidity and their role in cases of male infertility. We studied the presence, in males assisted in specialized care, of non-ulcerative genital tract infections-producing agents.

Methods: We studied descriptively and retrospective microbiological results of 3,066 samples of male patients, with diagnosis of genital tract infection episode, received between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Detection of microorganisms in the sample was performed using techniques of artificial culture and PCR (BD-MAX).

Results: Positive results were obtained in 451 samples (14.71%). By culture, the most frequent pathogens were Enterobacterales (18.40%), Enterococcus (13.75%), Haemophilus (8.65%), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (8.43%), Ureaplasma (5.10%), and Candida (3.77%). By polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the most frequent were N. gonorrhoeae (28.37%), Chlamydia trachomatis (26.95%), Ureaplasma urealyticum (17.73%), Mycoplasma hominis/Ureaplasma parvum (10.64%), and Mycoplasma genitalium (7.10%). The age was older in patients infected with Enterobacterales, Candida, or Enterococcus and younger in those infected with N. gonorrhoeae.

Conclusions: N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis are still more common in male genital infection pathogens, although other culturable microorganisms have an important role. These findings demonstrate the importance of systematically applying both conventional culture and PCR techniques for pathogen detection.

Citing Articles

Prior immunity to protects against respiratory infection in immunosuppressed mice.

Al-Jabri M, Patel R, Fleming D Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 13(1):e0176324.

PMID: 39560424 PMC: 11705917. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01763-24.


Prevalence of , and in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Cutoiu A, Boda D Biomed Rep. 2023; 19(4):74.

PMID: 37746588 PMC: 10511948. DOI: 10.3892/br.2023.1656.


[Increased infections by herpes simplex virus type 1 and polymicrobials of the genital tract, in the general population of a Spanish middle city].

Perez-Torralba C, Ruiz-Olivares M, Sanbonmatsu-Gamez S, Exposito-Ruiz M, Navarro-Mari J, Gutierrez-Fernandez J Rev Esp Quimioter. 2021; 34(4):320-329.

PMID: 33886170 PMC: 8329564. DOI: 10.37201/req/004.2021.

References
1.
Sena A, Lensing S, Rompalo A, Taylor S, Martin D, Lopez L . Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis infections in men with nongonococcal urethritis: predictors and persistence after therapy. J Infect Dis. 2012; 206(3):357-65. PMC: 3490700. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis356. View

2.
Maeda S, Deguchi T, Ishiko H, Matsumoto T, Naito S, Kumon H . Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma parvum (biovar 1) and Ureaplasma urealyticum (biovar 2) in patients with non-gonococcal urethritis using polymerase chain reaction-microtiter plate hybridization. Int J Urol. 2004; 11(9):750-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00887.x. View

3.
Navarrete R, Gonzalez Enguita C, Garcia Cardoso J, Manzarbeitia G, Soriano Garcia F . [Chronic prostatitis: critical review of its current nosologic definition, classification and potential carcinogenesis]. Arch Esp Urol. 2007; 60(6):617-23. DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142007000600001. View

4.
Borrego-Jimenez J, Foronda Garcia-Hidalgo C, Navarro-Mari J, Gutierrez-Fernandez J . Mycoplasma genitalium: Using a commercial molecular technique that facilitates rapid detection of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019; 38(2):91-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2019.03.005. View

5.
Bradshaw C, Tabrizi S, Read T, Garland S, Hopkins C, Moss L . Etiologies of nongonococcal urethritis: bacteria, viruses, and the association with orogenital exposure. J Infect Dis. 2006; 193(3):336-45. DOI: 10.1086/499434. View