» Articles » PMID: 31641810

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction is Associated with High Revision Rates: Results from the Danish Knee Ligament Registry

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Oct 24
PMID 31641810
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The quadriceps tendon (QT) has recently gained interest as an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) autograft. There is a paucity of data from large cohort studies on failures and revision rates after ACLR using the QT graft. The purpose of the present study is to use the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR) to compare revision rates, objective knee stability and subjective clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone ACLR with QT, hamstring tendon (HT), and patellar tendon (PT) as a graft for ACLR. It was hypothesized that QT autografts would result in similar objective knee stability and revision rates as HT and PT autografts.

Methods: Data on primary ACLRs in the DKRR from 2005 through 2017 were analyzed. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Tegner activity scale scores, sagittal knee laxity, pivot-shift tests at 1-year follow-up and revision rates at 2-year follow-up were compared for the three autograft cohorts.

Results: A total of 531 QT, 14,213 HT and 1835 PT ACLR were registered in the DKLR between 2005 and 2017. QT autograft was associated with statistically significant increased laxity (1.8 mm) compared to HT autograft (1.5 mm) (p < 0.001) and more positive pivot shift. There was a significant higher revision rate for QT (4.7%), compared to PT (1.5%) and HT (2.3%) autografts at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.002).

Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon autografts for ACLR was associated with higher revision rates than HT and PT grafts. QT graft was also associated with small increased objective knee laxity and more positive pivot shift than HT and PT grafts.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Citing Articles

Minimally Invasive 2-Incision Patellar Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Retrograde Reamer Guide to Prevent Graft-Construct Mismatch.

Koolmees D, Lamplot J, Nahr A, Coble T, Azar F, Bernholt D Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 14(2):103230.

PMID: 40041340 PMC: 11873465. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103230.


Comparison of Arthrofibrosis After ACL Reconstruction According to Graft Choice: Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft.

Johnson B, Smith C, Smith C, Quilligan E, Deshpande V, Gardner V Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241311916.

PMID: 39963266 PMC: 11831625. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241311916.


Comparison of Clinical Results Using Hamstring Versus Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Bone Patella Tendon in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fallah E, Naghshbandi M, Ghafoury R, Hosseini Zare N Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024; 38:79.

PMID: 39678774 PMC: 11644201. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.38.79.


Age under 20 years, pre-operative participation in pivoting sports, and steep posterior tibial slope of more than 12° are risk factors for graft failure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Goto K, Honda E, Iwaso H, Sameshima S, Inagawa M, Ishida Y J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70102.

PMID: 39629195 PMC: 11612570. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70102.


Patient Preferences for Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Pearsall C, Chen A, Abdelaziz A, Saltzman B, Piasecki D, Popkin C Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(8):23259671241258429.

PMID: 39157023 PMC: 11328237. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241258429.


References
1.
Hamrin Senorski E, Seil R, Svantesson E, Feller J, Webster K, Engebretsen L . "I never made it to the pros…" Return to sport and becoming an elite athlete after pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury-Current evidence and future directions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(4):1011-1018. PMC: 5876277. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4811-4. View