Academia-industry Digital Health Collaborations: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Development and uptake of digital health technologies benefit from cross-sectoral efforts from academia and industry. Our study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with academia-industry collaborations in digital health in middle- and high-income countries.
Methods: Trained personnel conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 stakeholders who were active in industry, academia or both. Stakeholders were based in middle-income countries (including China) and high-income countries (including the United States) as defined by the World Bank. Interviews were conducted in the stakeholder's language of choice (Chinese, = 12; English, = 11). Qualitative interview questions elicited perspectives on stakeholders' experience with academia-industry collaboration, challenges faced, and factors that facilitated the process. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, thematically coded by bilingual coders and analyzed using inductive content analysis.
Results: Stakeholders in both academia and industry identified complementary roles, authentic communication between partners, and clearly outlined goals or expectations prior to the collaboration as primary facilitators for success. Misaligned goals or expectations, differences in timelines for productivity and difficulties balancing expectations for business outcomes versus generation of scientific evidence were identified as primary barriers. Stakeholders in high-income countries reported inauthentic communication as a significant barrier to collaboration, whereas those in middle-income countries did not.
Conclusion: Outlining and communicating openly about goals and expectations for timeline and priorities as well as establishing complementary roles will facilitate fruitful academia-industry collaborations in the future. Best practices for communication styles may be dependent on the cultural setting, and thus should be adopted accordingly.
Austin J, Lobo E, Samadbeik M, Engstrom T, Philip R, Pole J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e58637.
PMID: 39705072 PMC: 11699496. DOI: 10.2196/58637.
Challenges and solutions to banning the advertisement of unhealthy products: a qualitative study.
Najafi M, Mosadeghrad A, Arab M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2956.
PMID: 39448981 PMC: 11515278. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19846-3.
Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review.
Najafi M, Mosadeghrad A, Arab M Iran J Public Health. 2023; 52(11):2299-2312.
PMID: 38106823 PMC: 10719692. DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v52i11.14030.
Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals.
Borges do Nascimento I, Abdulazeem H, Vasanthan L, Martinez E, Zucoloto M, Ostengaard L NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):161.
PMID: 37723240 PMC: 10507089. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4.
Roesler A, Lange B J Res Nurs. 2022; 27(7):592-603.
PMID: 36405805 PMC: 9669936. DOI: 10.1177/17449871221086830.