» Articles » PMID: 31935985

Development and Fidelity Testing of the Test@Work Digital Toolkit for Employers on Workplace Health Checks and Opt-In HIV Testing

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jan 16
PMID 31935985
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the UK, few employers offer general health checks for employees, and opt-in HIV testing is rarely included. There is a need to provide evidence-based guidance and support for employers around health checks and HIV testing in the workplace. An Agile approach was used to develop and evaluate a digital toolkit to facilitate employers' understanding about workplace health screening.

Methods: The Test@Work toolkit development included an online survey (STAGE 1: = 201), stakeholder consultation (STAGE 2: = 19), expert peer review (STAGE 3: = 24), and pilot testing (STAGE 4: = 20). The toolkit includes employer guidance on workplace health promotion, workplace health screening, and confidential opt-in HIV testing with signposting to resources. Pilot testing included assessment of fidelity (delivery and engagement) and implementation qualities (attitudes, resources, practicality, acceptability, usability and cost).

Results: STAGE 1: The vast majority of respondents would consider offering general health checks in the workplace that included confidential opt-in HIV testing, and this view was broadly comparable across organisation types ( = 201; public: 87.8%; private: 89.7%; third: 87.1%). STAGES 2 and 3: Stakeholders highlighted essential content considerations: (1) inclusion of the business case for workplace health initiatives, (2) clear pathways to employer responsibilities, and (3) presenting HIV-related information alongside other areas of health. With regards presentation, stakeholders proposed that the toolkit should be concise, with clear signposting and be hosted on a trusted portal. STAGE 4: Employers were satisfied with the toolkit content, usability and utility. The toolkit had high fidelity with regards to delivery and employer engagement. Assessment of implementation qualities showed high usability and practicality, with low perceived burden for completion and acceptable cost implications. Very few resource challenges were reported, and the toolkit was considered to be appropriate for any type of organisation, irrespective of size or resources.

Conclusions: Employers perceived the Test@Work toolkit to be useful, meaningful and appropriate for their needs. This digital resource could be used to support employers to engage with health screening and opt-in HIV testing within the context of workplace health promotion.

Citing Articles

Alcohol Prevention in Urgent and Emergency Care (APUEC): Development and Evaluation of Workforce Digital Training on Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Treatment.

Blake H, Adams E, Chaplin W, Morris L, Mahmood I, Taylor M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(22).

PMID: 37998259 PMC: 10671475. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20227028.


Digital Training Program for Line Managers (Managing Minds at Work): Protocol for a Feasibility Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thomson L, Hassard J, Frost A, Bartle C, Yarker J, Munir F JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e48758.

PMID: 37874612 PMC: 10630869. DOI: 10.2196/48758.


Impact assessment of e-trainings in occupational safety and health: a literature review.

Barati Jozan M, Ghorbani B, Khalid M, Lotfata A, Tabesh H BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1187.

PMID: 37340453 PMC: 10280942. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16114-8.


Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework.

Somerset S, Jones W, Evans C, Cirelli C, Mbang D, Blake H BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1409.

PMID: 35870921 PMC: 9308504. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13787-5.


Managing Minds at Work: Development of a Digital Line Manager Training Program.

Blake H, Vaughan B, Bartle C, Yarker J, Munir F, Marwaha S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805665 PMC: 9266047. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138006.


References
1.
Gourlay A, Pharris A, Noori T, Supervie V, Rosinska M, van Sighem A . Towards standardized definitions for monitoring the continuum of HIV care in Europe. AIDS. 2017; 31(15):2053-2058. PMC: 5603982. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001597. View

2.
Murray E, Hekler E, Andersson G, Collins L, Doherty A, Hollis C . Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(5):843-851. PMC: 5324832. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008. View

3.
Blake H, Banerjee A, Evans C . Employer attitudes towards general health checks and HIV testing in the workplace. Public Health. 2018; 156:34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.004. View

4.
Blake H, Zhou D, Batt M . Five-year workplace wellness intervention in the NHS. Perspect Public Health. 2013; 133(5):262-71. DOI: 10.1177/1757913913489611. View

5.
Kerr D, Ornelas I, Lilly M, Calhoun R, Meischke H . Participant Engagement in and Perspectives on a Web-Based Mindfulness Intervention for 9-1-1 Telecommunicators: Multimethod Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(6):e13449. PMC: 6607772. DOI: 10.2196/13449. View