» Articles » PMID: 31594513

Synchronized Mating Signals in a Communication Network: the Challenge of Avoiding Predators While Attracting Mates

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Oct 10
PMID 31594513
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conspicuous mating signals attract mates but also expose signallers to predators and parasites. Signal evolution, therefore, is driven by conflicting selective pressures from multiple receivers, both target and non-target. Synchronization of mating signals, for example, is an evolutionary puzzle, given the assumed high cost of reduced female attraction when signals overlap. Synchronization may be beneficial, however, if overlapping signals reduce attraction of non-target receivers. We investigate how signal synchronization is shaped by the trade-off between natural and sexual selection in two anuran species: pug-nosed tree frogs (), in which males produce mating calls in near-perfect synchrony, and túngara frogs (), in which males alternate their calls. To examine the trade-off imposed by signal synchronization, we conducted field and laboratory playback experiments on eavesdropping enemies (bats and midges) and target receivers (female frogs). Our results suggest that, while synchronization can be a general strategy for signallers to reduce their exposure to eavesdroppers, relaxed selection by females for unsynchronized calls is key to the evolution and maintenance of signal synchrony. This study highlights the role of relaxed selection in our understanding of the origin of mating signals and displays.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Reproductive Strategies and Immunological Interactions in -Resistant Japanese Tree Frogs.

Lee J, Park J, Do Y Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39858154 PMC: 11758651. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020154.


Snake-like bird hisses induce anti-predator responses in a frog.

Zhao L, Qin Y, Jin Y, Wang J, Liang W BMC Ecol Evol. 2024; 24(1):126.

PMID: 39394096 PMC: 11475202. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02312-4.


Collective synchrony of mating signals modulated by ecological cues and social signals in bioluminescent sea fireflies.

Hensley N, Rivers T, Gerrish G, Saha R, Oakley T Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2011):20232311.

PMID: 38018106 PMC: 10685132. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2311.


Direct input of monitoring data into a mechanistic ecological model as a way to identify the phytoplankton growth-rate response to temperature variations.

Medvinsky A, Nurieva N, Adamovich B, Radchikova N, Rusakov A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10124.

PMID: 37349488 PMC: 10287759. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36950-3.


Changes in Red Color Sensitivity over the Spawning Cycle of Female Three-spined Stickleback ().

Li L, Roufidou C, Borg B, Shao Y Zool Stud. 2022; 61:e17.

PMID: 36330025 PMC: 9579950. DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2022.61-17.


References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Taga M, Bassler B . Chemical communication among bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100 Suppl 2:14549-54. PMC: 304117. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1934514100. View

3.
Reaney L, Sims R, Sims S, Jennions M, Backwell P . Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(2):R62-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.047. View

4.
Legett H, Page R, Bernal X . Synchronized mating signals in a communication network: the challenge of avoiding predators while attracting mates. Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1912):20191067. PMC: 6790779. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1067. View

5.
Greenfield M, Schul J . Mechanisms and evolution of synchronous chorusing: emergent properties and adaptive functions in Neoconocephalus katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J Comp Psychol. 2008; 122(3):289-97. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.289. View