» Articles » PMID: 31586318

Fermented Mulberry Leaf Meal As Fishmeal Replacer in the Formulation of Feed for Carp Labeo Rohita and Catfish Heteropneustes Fossilis-optimization by Mathematical Programming

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Oct 6
PMID 31586318
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Search for cost-effective, eco-friendly and sustainable plant resources as potential feedstuff to replace fishmeal in the formulation of feed for fish has been in the forefront of aquaculture researches since the last few years. In this study, experiments were conducted to evaluate if replacement of fishmeal by the fermented leaf meal of mulberry (Morus indica) was viable in the formulation of feed for carp fish Labeo rohita and catfish Heteropneustes fossilis. Four iso-proteinous, iso-lipidic and iso-energetic experimental feed were formulated by replacing 0, 25, 50 and 75% of fishmeal by the fermented mulberry leaf meal (FMLM), and both species were grown on these feeds for 8 weeks. Since the results revealed differences in response to fishmeal replacement level between parameters, we determined optimum fishmeal replacement level (OFRL) for each parameter from the polynomial curve equation. While maximum weight gain and specific growth rate and minimum feed conversion ratio was found at 30-32% OFRL for L. rohita and at 52-53% OFRL for H. fossilis, other parameters responded differently in both fish. Therefore, we applied a two-phase fuzzy goal programming technique using all parameters, which showed overall OFRL for L. rohita and H. fossilis as 30.95% and 52%, respectively. We also applied the concept of 'decision tree' to identify the key factor behind utilization of FMLM. It was concluded that activity of amylase and subsequent utilization of carbohydrate was the key factor in utilizing FMLM. Interestingly, H. fossilis was found more efficient in utilizing carbohydrate of FMLM than L. rohita.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Assessment of Rapeseed Meal as a Fish Meal Substitute in Hybrid Sturgeon ( ♀ ×  ♂) Diets: Impacts on Growth Performance, Body Composition, Immunological Responses, Intestinal Histology, and Inflammatory Response.

Zhang W, Liu S, Wang S, Wang H, Ge K, Yang Y Aquac Nutr. 2025; 2025:6415465.

PMID: 39949364 PMC: 11824838. DOI: 10.1155/anu/6415465.


Evaluation of growth, nutrient utilization, and metabolic function in rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton), fed diets incorporated with fermented Saraca asoca leaf meal.

Talukdar S, Ghosh K Fish Physiol Biochem. 2025; 51(1):3.

PMID: 39757307 DOI: 10.1007/s10695-024-01422-6.


Recycling of animal protein wastes in the formulation of feed for Labeo rohita and Mystus vittatus-a comparative evaluation.

Samaddar A, Kaviraj A, Nielsen I, Saha S Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(2):93.

PMID: 38430451 PMC: 10908637. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-03910-6.


The Protective Effect of a Dietary Extract of Mulberry ( L.) Leaves against a High Stocking Density, Copper and Trichlorfon in Crucian Carp ().

Chen G, Long J, Li H, Xu J, Yuan J, Yang Q Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627443 PMC: 10451522. DOI: 10.3390/ani13162652.


Perceptions and Liking Distortion from Information about the Nutritional Upgrades in Biofortified Seafood Products.

Castellini G, Vezzulli F, Lambri M, Sacchettini G, Graffigna G, Marques A Foods. 2022; 11(18).

PMID: 36140936 PMC: 9497835. DOI: 10.3390/foods11182808.


References
1.
Petersen B, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner D . Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(10):2231-44. PMC: 5027927. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew188. View

2.
Marks N, Lajtha A . PROTEIN BREAKDOWN IN THE BRAIN. SUBCELLULAR DISTRIBUTION AND PROPERTIES OF NEUTRAL AND ACID PROTEINASES. Biochem J. 1963; 89:438-47. PMC: 1202448. DOI: 10.1042/bj0890438. View

3.
BOLIN D, King R, KLOSTERMAN E . A simplified method for the determination of chromic oxide (Cr2 O3) when used as an index substance. Science. 1952; 116(3023):634-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.116.3023.634. View

4.
LOWRY O, ROSEBROUGH N, FARR A, RANDALL R . Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193(1):265-75. View

5.
Oksel C, Winkler D, Ma C, Wilkins T, Wang X . Accurate and interpretable nanoSAR models from genetic programming-based decision tree construction approaches. Nanotoxicology. 2016; 10(7):1001-12. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2016.1161857. View