» Articles » PMID: 31583110

Trophic Networks Improve the Performance of Microbial Anodes Treating Wastewater

Overview
Date 2019 Oct 5
PMID 31583110
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microbial anodes represent a distinct ecological niche that is characterized mainly by the terminal electron acceptor, i.e., the anode potential, and the substrate, i.e., the electron source. Here, we determine the performance and the biofilm community of anode microbiomes while using substrates of increasing complexity (organic acids or organic acids and sugar or real domestic wastewater) to mimic different, practically relevant, trophic levels. α-Diversity values increased with substrate complexity. In addition, the higher abundance value of in the biofilms corresponds to higher reactor performance (i.e., COD removal, current density, and Coulombic efficiency). In reactors exploiting real wastewater, the diversity of the planktonic microorganisms was only little affected. Microbiome network analysis revealed two important clusters for reactor performance as well as performance-independent pathogen-containing clusters. Interestingly, was not found to be integrated in the network underlining its outstanding individual ecological role in line with its importance for the efficiency of the electron harvest for all reactors. The microbiome analysis of different trophic levels and their temporal development from initial colonization to stable treatment demonstrate important principles for the implementation of microbial anodes for wastewater treatment.

Citing Articles

Effect of model methanogens on the electrochemical activity, stability, and microbial community structure of Geobacter spp. dominated biofilm anodes.

Dzofou Ngoumelah D, Heggeset T, Haugen T, Sulheim S, Wentzel A, Harnisch F NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024; 10(1):17.

PMID: 38443373 PMC: 10915144. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00490-z.


Effect of anode material and dispersal limitation on the performance and biofilm community in microbial electrolysis cells.

Abadikhah M, Liu M, Persson F, Wilen B, Farewell A, Sun J Biofilm. 2023; 6:100161.

PMID: 37859795 PMC: 10582064. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100161.


Investigating Variability in Microbial Fuel Cells.

Leicester D, Settle S, McCann C, Heidrich E Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023; 89(3):e0218122.

PMID: 36840599 PMC: 10057029. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02181-22.


Evidence of competition between electrogens shaping electroactive microbial communities in microbial electrolysis cells.

Abadikhah M, Rodriguez M, Persson F, Wilen B, Farewell A, Modin O Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:959211.

PMID: 36590422 PMC: 9800620. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.959211.


Monitoring stratification of anode biofilms in bioelectrochemical laminar flow reactors using flow cytometry.

Guo Y, Rosa L, Muller S, Harnisch F Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2022; 4:100062.

PMID: 36157706 PMC: 9488081. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2020.100062.


References
1.
Bartram A, Lynch M, Stearns J, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Neufeld J . Generation of multimillion-sequence 16S rRNA gene libraries from complex microbial communities by assembling paired-end illumina reads. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(11):3846-52. PMC: 3127616. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02772-10. View

2.
Bond D, Lovley D . Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(3):1548-55. PMC: 150094. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003. View

3.
Kiely P, Regan J, Logan B . The electric picnic: synergistic requirements for exoelectrogenic microbial communities. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011; 22(3):378-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.03.003. View

4.
Kim H, Hwang C, Cho B . Arcobacter marinus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 60(Pt 3):531-536. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.007740-0. View

5.
Sasi Jyothsna T, Rahul K, Ramaprasad E, Sasikala C, Ramana C . Arcobacter anaerophilus sp. nov., isolated from an estuarine sediment and emended description of the genus Arcobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013; 63(Pt 12):4619-4625. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.054155-0. View