» Articles » PMID: 31583015

Numerical Analysis of a Dental Zirconium Restoration and the Stresses That Occur in Dental Tissues

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Oct 5
PMID 31583015
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When it is about restorative dental materials, aesthetics is traditionally preferred. This has led to the selection of materials very visually similar to the enamel, but unfortunately, their mechanical properties are not similar. This often translates into disadvantages than advantages. In the present work, a comparison is made of the stresses that occur during dental occlusion (dental bit) in a healthy dental organ and those that are generated in a dental organ with a dental zirconium restoration. Numerical simulation was carried out by means of the Finite Element Method, in computational biomodels, from Cone-Beam Tomography, to obtain the stresses generated during dental occlusion. It was found that the normal and stresses generated are substantially greater in the molar with restoration compared to those produced in the healthy molar. In addition, the normal function of the enamel and dentin to disperse these stresses to prevent them from reaching the pulp is altered. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the indiscriminate use of this restoration material and consider other aspects, in addition to aesthetics and biocompatibility for the choice of restorative materials such as .

Citing Articles

How Does the First Molar Root Location Affect the Critical Stress Pattern in the Periodontium? A Finite Element Analysis.

Baghani Z, Soheilifard R, Bayat S J Dent (Shiraz). 2023; 24(2):182-193.

PMID: 37388195 PMC: 10300141. DOI: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.93271.1704.


Numerical Analysis of Zirconium and Titanium Implants under the Effect of Critical Masticatory Load.

Martinez-Mondragon M, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Romero-Angeles B, Maya-Anaya D, Martinez-Reyes J, Gallegos-Funes F Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(21).

PMID: 36363435 PMC: 9657110. DOI: 10.3390/ma15217843.


Numerical Analysis of the , with Sprains of Different Degrees after Trauma.

Marquet-Rivera R, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Romero-Angeles B, Hernandez-Vazquez R, Mastache-Miranda O, Cruz-Lopez S Comput Math Methods Med. 2021; 2021:2109348.

PMID: 34349834 PMC: 8328720. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2109348.


Comparative Numerical Analysis between Two Types of Orthodontic Wire for the Lingual Technique, Using the Finite Element Method.

Hernandez-Vazquez R, Marquet-Rivera R, Mastache-Miranda O, Vazquez-Lopez A, Cruz-Lopez S, Vazquez-Feijoo J Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021; 2021:6658039.

PMID: 33833825 PMC: 8018868. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6658039.

References
1.
Pelaez J, Cogolludo P, Serrano B, Serrano J, Suarez M . A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2012; 25(5):451-8. View

2.
Pecho O, Ghinea R, Ionescu A, Cardona J, Della Bona A, Perez M . Optical behavior of dental zirconia and dentin analyzed by Kubelka-Munk theory. Dent Mater. 2014; 31(1):60-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.012. View

3.
Urapepon S, Taenguthai P . The effect of zirconia framework design on the failure of all-ceramic crown under static loading. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7(2):146-50. PMC: 4414945. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.2.146. View

4.
Beger B, Goetz H, Morlock M, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B . In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2018; 4(1):13. PMC: 5918143. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-018-0124-8. View

5.
Chun K, Choi H, Lee J . Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech. 2014; 5:1758736014520809. PMC: 3924884. DOI: 10.1177/1758736014520809. View