» Articles » PMID: 31580086

Using Drift Diffusion Modeling to Understand Inattentive Behavior in Preterm and Term-born Children

Overview
Journal Neuropsychology
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Oct 4
PMID 31580086
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Children born very preterm are at increased risk of inattention, but it remains unclear whether the underlying processes are the same as in their term-born peers. Drift diffusion modeling (DDM) may better characterize the cognitive processes underlying inattention than standard reaction time (RT) measures. This study used DDM to compare the processes related to inattentive behavior in preterm and term-born children.

Method: Performance on a cued continuous performance task was compared between 33 children born very preterm (VP; ≤ 32 weeks' gestation) and 32 term-born peers (≥ 37 weeks' gestation), aged 8-11 years. Both groups included children with a wide spectrum of parent-rated inattention (above average attention to severe inattention). Performance was defined using standard measures (RT, RT variability and accuracy) and modeled using a DDM. A hierarchical regression assessed the extent to which standard or DDM measures explained variance in parent-rated inattention and whether these relationships differed between VP and term-born children.

Results: There were no group differences in performance on standard or DDM measures of task performance. Parent-rated inattention correlated significantly with hit rate, RT variability, and drift rate (a DDM estimate of processing efficiency) in one or both groups. Regression analysis revealed that drift rate was the best predictor of parent-rated inattention. This relationship did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that less efficient information processing is a common mechanism underlying inattention in both VP and term-born children. This study demonstrates the benefits of using DDM to better characterize atypical cognitive processing in clinical samples. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Callous-unemotional traits moderate the association between inhibitory control and disruptive behavior problems.

Castagna P, Babinski D, Waschbusch D Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39276248 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-024-02582-9.


Optogenetic Inhibition of Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Impairs the Ability to Initiate and Stay on Task.

Vazquez D, Maulhardt S, Stalnaker T, Solway A, Charpentier C, Roesch M J Neurosci. 2024; 44(20).

PMID: 38569923 PMC: 11097287. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1850-23.2024.


Prior information use and response caution in perceptual decision-making: No evidence for a relationship with autistic-like traits.

Retzler C, Boehm U, Cai J, Cochrane A, Manning C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021; 74(11):1953-1965.

PMID: 33998332 PMC: 8450985. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211019939.

References
1.
Zhang J . The effects of evidence bounds on decision-making: theoretical and empirical developments. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:263. PMC: 3409448. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00263. View

2.
Arnett A, Pennington B, Friend A, Willcutt E, Byrne B, Samuelsson S . The SWAN captures variance at the negative and positive ends of the ADHD symptom dimension. J Atten Disord. 2011; 17(2):152-62. PMC: 3330134. DOI: 10.1177/1087054711427399. View

3.
Vaurio R, Simmonds D, Mostofsky S . Increased intra-individual reaction time variability in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across response inhibition tasks with different cognitive demands. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(12):2389-96. PMC: 4766847. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.022. View

4.
Wiecki T, Sofer I, Frank M . HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python. Front Neuroinform. 2013; 7:14. PMC: 3731670. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014. View

5.
Uebel H, Albrecht B, Asherson P, Borger N, Butler L, Chen W . Performance variability, impulsivity errors and the impact of incentives as gender-independent endophenotypes for ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009; 51(2):210-8. PMC: 2921046. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02139.x. View