» Articles » PMID: 31579781

Navigation and Visualisation with HoloLens in Endovascular Aortic Repair

Abstract

Introduction: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a minimal-invasive technique that prevents life-threatening rupture in patients with aortic pathologies by implantation of an endoluminal stent graft. During the endovascular procedure, device navigation is currently performed by fluoroscopy in combination with digital subtraction angiography. This study presents the current iterative process of biomedical engineering within the disruptive interdisciplinary project , which includes advanced navigation, image techniques and augmented reality with the aim of reducing side effects (namely radiation exposure and contrast agent administration) and optimising visualisation during EVAR procedures. This article describes the current prototype developed in this project and the experiments conducted to evaluate it.

Methods: The current approach of the project is guiding EVAR interventions in real-time with an electromagnetic tracking system after attaching a sensor on the catheter tip and displaying this information on Microsoft HoloLens glasses. This augmented reality technology enables the visualisation of virtual objects superimposed on the real environment. These virtual objects include three-dimensional (3D) objects (namely 3D models of the skin and vascular structures) and two-dimensional (2D) objects [namely orthogonal views of computed tomography (CT) angiograms, 2D images of 3D vascular models, and 2D images of a new virtual angioscopy whose appearance of the vessel wall follows that shown in and angioscopies]. Specific external markers were designed to be used as landmarks in the registration process to map the tracking data and radiological data into a common space. In addition, the use of real-time 3D ultrasound (US) is also under evaluation in the project for guiding endovascular tools and updating navigation with intraoperative imaging. US volumes are streamed from the US system to HoloLens and visualised at a certain distance from the probe by tracking augmented reality markers. A human model torso that includes a 3D printed patient-specific aortic model was built to provide a realistic test environment for evaluation of technical components in the project. The solutions presented in this study were tested by using an US training model and the aortic-aneurysm phantom.

Results: During the navigation of the catheter tip in the US training model, the 3D models of the phantom surface and vessels were visualised on HoloLens. In addition, a virtual angioscopy was also built from a CT scan of the aortic-aneurysm phantom. The external markers designed for this study were visible in the CT scan and the electromagnetically tracked pointer fitted in each marker hole. US volumes of the US training model were sent from the US system to HoloLens in order to display them, showing a latency of 259±86 ms (mean±standard deviation).

Conclusion: The project tackles the problem of radiation exposure and contrast agent administration during EVAR interventions by using a multidisciplinary approach to guide the endovascular tools. Its current state presents several limitations such as the rigid alignment between preoperative data and the simulated patient. Nevertheless, the techniques shown in this study in combination with fibre Bragg gratings and optical coherence tomography are a promising approach to overcome the problems of EVAR interventions.

Citing Articles

FBG-driven simulation for virtual augmentation of fluoroscopic images during endovascular interventions.

Scarponi V, Verde J, Haouchine N, Duprez M, Nageotte F, Cotin S Healthc Technol Lett. 2024; 11(6):392-401.

PMID: 39720742 PMC: 11665791. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12108.


HoloLens platform for healthcare professionals simulation training, teaching, and its urological applications: an up-to-date review.

Tataru O, Ferro M, Marchioni M, Veccia A, Coman O, Lasorsa F Ther Adv Urol. 2024; 16:17562872241297554.

PMID: 39654822 PMC: 11626676. DOI: 10.1177/17562872241297554.


Assessing the Effect of Augmented Reality on Procedural Outcomes During Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access.

Saruwatari M, Nguyen T, Fooladi Talari H, Matisoff A, Sharma K, Donoho K Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023; 49(11):2346-2353.

PMID: 37573178 PMC: 10658651. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.07.011.


3D Visualisation of Navigation Catheters for Endovascular Procedures Using a 3D Hub and Fiber Optic RealShape Technology: Phantom Study Results.

Bydlon T, Torjesen A, Fokkenrood S, Di Tullio A, Flexman M EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023; 59:24-30.

PMID: 37389371 PMC: 10300314. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.05.006.


Translation of Medical AR Research into Clinical Practice.

Seibold M, Spirig J, Esfandiari H, Farshad M, Furnstahl P J Imaging. 2023; 9(2).

PMID: 36826963 PMC: 9961816. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9020044.


References
1.
Borot de Battisti M, Denis de Senneville B, Maenhout M, Lagendijk J, van Vulpen M, Hautvast G . Fiber Bragg gratings-based sensing for real-time needle tracking during MR-guided brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2016; 43(10):5288. DOI: 10.1118/1.4961743. View

2.
Bartal G, Vano E, Paulo G, Miller D . Management of patient and staff radiation dose in interventional radiology: current concepts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013; 37(2):289-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-013-0685-0. View

3.
Petersch B, Hadwiger M, Hauser H, Honigmann D . Real time computation and temporal coherence of opacity transfer functions for direct volume rendering of ultrasound data. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2005; 29(1):53-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.013. View

4.
Pratt P, Ives M, Lawton G, Simmons J, Radev N, Spyropoulou L . Through the HoloLens™ looking glass: augmented reality for extremity reconstruction surgery using 3D vascular models with perforating vessels. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018; 2(1):2. PMC: 5909360. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-017-0033-2. View

5.
Truijers M, Pol J, SchultzeKool L, van Sterkenburg S, Fillinger M, Blankensteijn J . Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006; 33(4):401-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.10.009. View