Reviving Rare Chicken Breeds Using Genetically Engineered Sterility in Surrogate Host Birds
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In macrolecithal species, cryopreservation of the oocyte and zygote is not possible due to the large size and quantity of lipid deposited within the egg. For birds, this signifies that cryopreserving and regenerating a species from frozen cellular material are currently technically unfeasible. Diploid primordial germ cells (PGCs) are a potential means to freeze down the entire genome and reconstitute an avian species from frozen material. Here, we examine the use of genetically engineered (GE) sterile female layer chicken as surrogate hosts for the transplantation of cryopreserved avian PGCs from rare heritage breeds of chicken. We first amplified PGC numbers in culture before cryopreservation and subsequent transplantation into host GE embryos. We found that all hatched offspring from the chimera GE hens were derived from the donor rare heritage breed broiler PGCs, and using cryopreserved semen, we were able to produce pure offspring. Measurement of the mutation rate of PGCs in culture revealed that 2.7 × 10 de novo single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were generated per cell division, which is comparable with other stem cell lineages. We also found that endogenous avian leukosis virus (ALV) retroviral insertions were not mobilized during in vitro propagation. Taken together, these results show that mutation rates are no higher than normal stem cells, essential if we are to conserve avian breeds. Thus, GE sterile avian surrogate hosts provide a viable platform to conserve and regenerate avian species using cryopreserved PGCs.
Zhao Z, Zou X, Zhu Y, He Y, Jebessa E, Zhang J Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).
PMID: 40003070 PMC: 11851890. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040590.
Propagation of goose primordial germ cells in vitro relies on FGF and BMP signalling pathways.
Doddamani D, Lazar B, Ichikawa K, Hu T, Taylor L, Gocza E Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):301.
PMID: 40000797 PMC: 11861285. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07715-7.
Kinoshita K, Tanabe K, Nakamura Y, Nishijima K, Suzuki T, Okuzaki Y Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1127.
PMID: 39271811 PMC: 11399235. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06775-5.
Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens.
Gong W, Zou Y, Liu X, Niu Y, Jin K, Li B Anim Biosci. 2024; 37(11):1873-1886.
PMID: 39118547 PMC: 11541041. DOI: 10.5713/ab.24.0283.
The Effect of Short- and Long-Term Cryopreservation on Chicken Primordial Germ Cells.
Ibrahim M, Grochowska E, Lazar B, Varkonyi E, Bednarczyk M, Stadnicka K Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(5).
PMID: 38790253 PMC: 11121574. DOI: 10.3390/genes15050624.