» Articles » PMID: 31573931

Development of Ovarian Tissue Autograft to Restore Ovarian Function: Protocol for a French Multicenter Cohort Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Oct 2
PMID 31573931
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sterility is a major late effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments. Iatrogenic sterility is often permanent and greatly impacts long-term quality of life. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) performed before gonadotoxic treatments with subsequent autograft is a method of fertility preservation available for girls and women. Its application in prepubertal girls is of particular value as it is the only possible approach in this patient group. In addition, it does not require a delay in cancer therapy and no ovarian stimulation is needed.

Objective: The primary aim of this protocol is to help increase the implementation of ovarian tissue autografting in France. Knowledge is still lacking regarding the efficacy of ovarian transplantation in restoring ovarian function and regarding the safety of this procedure, especially the risk of cancer cell reseeding in certain types of cancer. A secondary aim of this study is to generate data to improve our understanding of these two essential aspects.

Methods: The DATOR (Development of Ovarian Tissue Autograft in Order to Restore Ovarian Function) study is ongoing in 17 university hospitals. The DATOR protocol includes the autograft of ovarian cortex fragments. Candidates are identified from an observational prospective cohort (called the Prospective Cohort of Patients Candidates for Ovarian Tissue Autograft [PERIDATOR]) of patients who have undergone OTC. Enrollment in the study is initiated at the patient's request and must be validated by the center's multidisciplinary team and by the study steering committee. The DATOR study begins with a total medical checkup. Ovarian tissue qualification and residual disease detection, if required, are performed.

Results: The study is ongoing. Currently, 38 patients have provided informed consent and have been entered into the DATOR study. Graft has been performed for 34 of these patients. An interim analysis was conducted on the first 25 patients for whom the period of at least 1 year posttransplantation was achieved. Out of these 25 patients, 11 women succeeded in becoming pregnant (pregnancy rate=44% [11/25]; delivery rate=40% [10/25]). Among these, 6 women conceived twice, and 1 pregnancy led to a miscarriage.

Conclusions: Our preliminary analysis appears to be coherent with the accumulating body of evidence indicating the potential utility of ovarian tissue autograft for patients with premature ovarian failure. All these elements justify the pursuit of our study.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02846064; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02846064.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/12944.

Citing Articles

Folliculogenesis resumption after ovarian cortex transplantation: what is the earliest hormonal indicator?.

Cathelain A, Keller L, Collinet P, Kerbage Y, dOrazio E, Piver P Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(6):3209-3218.

PMID: 39613984 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07810-w.


Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies following autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation: a systematic review with pooled analysis.

Erden M, Uyanik E, Demeestere I, Oktay K Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 231(5):480-489.

PMID: 38621483 PMC: 11473709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.012.


Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

Fraison E, Huberlant S, Labrune E, Cavalieri M, Montagut M, Brugnon F Hum Reprod. 2022; 38(3):489-502.

PMID: 36421038 PMC: 9977128. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac249.


Minimal residual disease detection by multicolor flow cytometry in cryopreserved ovarian tissue from leukemia patients.

Zver T, Frontczak S, Poirot C, Rives-Feraille A, Leroy-Martin B, Koscinski I J Ovarian Res. 2022; 15(1):9.

PMID: 35042558 PMC: 8767661. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00936-4.

References
1.
Amiot C, Angelot-Delettre F, Zver T, Alvergnas-Vieille M, Saas P, Garnache-Ottou F . Minimal residual disease detection of leukemic cells in ovarian cortex by eight-color flow cytometry. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(8):2157-67. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det126. View

2.
Donfack N, Alves K, Araujo V, Cordova A, Figueiredo J, Smitz J . Expectations and limitations of ovarian tissue transplantation. Zygote. 2017; 25(4):391-403. DOI: 10.1017/S0967199417000338. View

3.
Levine J, Kelvin J, Quinn G, Gracia C . Infertility in reproductive-age female cancer survivors. Cancer. 2015; 121(10):1532-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29181. View

4.
Peccatori F, Azim Jr H, Orecchia R, Hoekstra H, Pavlidis N, Kesic V . Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24 Suppl 6:vi160-70. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt199. View

5.
Kagawa N, Silber S, Kuwayama M . Successful vitrification of bovine and human ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18(4):568-77. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60136-8. View