» Articles » PMID: 31572332

Efficacy of Fecal Sampling As a Gut Proxy in the Study of Chicken Gut Microbiota

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2019 Oct 2
PMID 31572332
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the convenience and non-invasiveness of fecal sampling, the fecal microbiota does not fully represent that of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and the efficacy of fecal sampling to accurately represent the gut microbiota in birds is poorly understood. In this study, we aim to identify the efficacy of feces as a gut proxy in birds using chickens as a model. We collected 1,026 samples from 206 chickens, including duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and feces samples, for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing analyses. In this study, the efficacy of feces as a gut proxy was partitioned to microbial community membership and community structure. Most taxa in the small intestine (84.11-87.28%) and ceca (99.39%) could be identified in feces. Microbial community membership was reflected with a gut anatomic feature, but community structure was not. Excluding shared microbes, the small intestine and ceca contributed 34.12 and 5.83% of the total fecal members, respectively. The composition of Firmicutes members in the small intestine and that of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria members in the ceca could be well mirrored by the observations in fecal samples (ρ = 0.54-0.71 and 0.71-0.78, respectively, < 0.001). However, there were few significant correlations for each genus between feces and each of the four gut segments, and these correlations were not high (ρ = -0.2-0.4, < 0.05) for most genera. Our results suggest that fecal microbial community has a good potential to identify most taxa in the chicken gut and could moderately mirror the microbial structure in the intestine at the microbial population level with phylum specificity. However, it should be interpreted with caution by using feces as a proxy to study associations for microbial structure at individual microorganism level.

Citing Articles

Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Omega-3 PUFA Enriched Fish Oil During Late-Pregnancy and Lactation on Reproductive Performance, Immune Activity and Fecal Microbiota Composition in Postpartum Sows.

Ge Z, An Y, Lan W, Li X Vet Sci. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40005899 PMC: 11860538. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12020139.


Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome.

Burrows P, Godoy-Santos F, Lawther K, Richmond A, Corcionivoschi N, Huws S BMC Microbiol. 2025; 25(1):35.

PMID: 39833701 PMC: 11744950. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03690-x.


Impact of gut microbial diversity on egg production performance in chickens.

Wu L, Zhang T, Luo Z, Xiao H, Wang D, Wu C Microbiol Spectr. 2025; 13(2):e0192724.

PMID: 39807896 PMC: 11792489. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01927-24.


Research advancements on the diversity and host interaction of gut microbiota in chickens.

Yue Y, Luasiri P, Li J, Laosam P, Sangsawad P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1492545.

PMID: 39628868 PMC: 11611998. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1492545.


Gut microbiome in two high-altitude bird populations showed heterogeneity in sex and life stage.

Sun M, Halimubieke N, Fang B, Valdebenito J, Xu X, Sheppard S FEMS Microbes. 2024; 5:xtae020.

PMID: 39385800 PMC: 11462087. DOI: 10.1093/femsmc/xtae020.


References
1.
Stanley D, Hughes R, Moore R . Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(10):4301-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5646-2. View

2.
Shaufi M, Sieo C, Chong C, Gan H, Wan Ho Y . Deciphering chicken gut microbial dynamics based on high-throughput 16S rRNA metagenomics analyses. Gut Pathog. 2015; 7:4. PMC: 4372169. DOI: 10.1186/s13099-015-0051-7. View

3.
Yan W, Sun C, Yuan J, Yang N . Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:45308. PMC: 7365323. DOI: 10.1038/srep45308. View

4.
Stanley D, Geier M, Chen H, Hughes R, Moore R . Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences. BMC Microbiol. 2015; 15:51. PMC: 4403768. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0388-6. View

5.
Li D, Chen H, Mao B, Yang Q, Zhao J, Gu Z . Microbial Biogeography and Core Microbiota of the Rat Digestive Tract. Sci Rep. 2017; 8:45840. PMC: 5379200. DOI: 10.1038/srep45840. View