» Articles » PMID: 31568619

Understanding the Patient Population and Test Utilization for Hepatitis B Virus Testing

Overview
Journal J Clin Lab Anal
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Oct 1
PMID 31568619
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global concern with different epidemiologies due to several factors including migration, vaccination policies, and new antiviral treatment regimens. It is important to understand the characteristics of a patient population, including the prevalence of diseases, and to assess test utilization to understand and evaluate the clinical performance of laboratory tests and to improve the quality of clinical laboratories.

Materials And Methods: In this study, we evaluated serologic and virologic laboratory tests including hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B surface antibody, hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B envelope antibody, and HBV DNA in Korean adults who were exposed to HBV.

Results: During the 1-year study period, we obtained 22 750 specimens from 17 523 adult Korean patients (>18.0 years; 9894 males and 7629 females) with a median age of 50.1 years (interquartile range, 42.2-58.2 years). Among them, five serologic and virologic laboratory tests were performed for 1340 (5.9%) specimens from 1172 adult Korean patients (>18.0 years; 647 males and 525 females) with a median age of 46.8 years (range, 19.0-84.5 years). The prevalence of serologic and virologic tests indicating several clinical situations was evaluated. The correlation coefficient between HBV DNA and HBeAg was ρ = 0.85 (P < .0001). However, 51.9% (695/1340) of samples did not show agreement between the two test results.

Conclusions: Analysis of the prevalence of patients categorized into five serologic and virologic laboratory results would be helpful to expand our knowledge about patient population characteristics and to improve test utilization.

Citing Articles

Recent information on test utilization and intraindividual change in anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody in Korea: a retrospective study.

Choi R, Park W, Chun G, Lee J, Lee S, Lee E BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35750359 PMC: 9234797. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002739.


Development of sensitive and specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with lateral flow device for the rapid detection of hepatitis B virus infection.

Maity S, Poonati R, Punati R, Mallepaddi P, Marothi Y, Mallepaddi P Braz J Microbiol. 2022; 53(2):615-623.

PMID: 35178681 PMC: 9151950. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-022-00690-9.


Diagnostic accuracy of LAMP assay for HBV infection.

Chen C, Ouyang S, Lin L, Wu L, Xie T, Chen J J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 34(7):e23281.

PMID: 32157743 PMC: 7370716. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23281.


Understanding the patient population and test utilization for hepatitis B virus testing.

Choi R, Oh Y, Park S, Lee S, Lee E J Clin Lab Anal. 2019; 33(9):e22987.

PMID: 31568619 PMC: 6868419. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22987.

References
1.
Roushan M, Mohammadpour M, Baiany M, Soleimani S, Bijani A . Time to seroconversion of HBsAg to anti-HBs in individuals who lost HBsAg during follow-up. Epidemiol Infect. 2016; 144(12):2648-53. PMC: 9150472. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816001217. View

2.
Terrault N, Bzowej N, Chang K, Hwang J, Jonas M, Murad M . AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2015; 63(1):261-83. PMC: 5987259. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28156. View

3.
Palmore T, Shah N, Loomba R, Borg B, Lopatin U, Feld J . Reactivation of hepatitis B with reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen after chemotherapy and immunosuppression. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7(10):1130-7. PMC: 2779698. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.027. View

4.
Freedman D . Towards Better Test Utilization - Strategies to Improve Physician Ordering and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes. EJIFCC. 2016; 26(1):15-30. PMC: 4975220. View

5.
Cornberg M, Wong V, Locarnini S, Brunetto M, Janssen H, Chan H . The role of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen revisited. J Hepatol. 2016; 66(2):398-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.009. View