Controlling the AP Controller: Controller Performance Assessment and Modification

Overview

Journal J Diabetes Sci Technol

Specialty Endocrinology

Date 2019 Sep 29

PMID 31561714

Authors

Iman Hajizadeh

Nicole Hobbs

Sediqeh Samadi

Mert Sevil

Mudassir Rashid

Rachel Brandt

Mohammad Reza Askari

Zacharie Maloney

Ali Cinar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite recent advances in closed-loop control of blood glucose concentration (BGC) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), online performance assessment and modification of artificial pancreas (AP) control systems remain a challenge as the metabolic characteristics of users change over time.

Methods: A controller performance assessment and modification system (CPAMS) analyzes the glucose concentration variations and controller behavior, and modifies the parameters of the control system used in the multivariable AP system. Various indices are defined to quantitatively evaluate the controller performance in real time. Controller performance assessment and modification system also incorporates online learning from historical data to anticipate impending disturbances and proactively counteract their effects.

Results: Using a multivariable simulation platform for T1D, the CPAMS is used to enhance the BGC regulation in people with T1D by means of automated insulin delivery with an adaptive learning predictive controller. Controller performance assessment and modification system increases the percentage of time in the target range (70-180) mg/dL by 52.3% without causing any hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia events.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate a significant improvement in the multivariable AP controller performance by using CPAMS.

References

Breton M, Farret A, Bruttomesso D, Anderson S, Magni L, Patek S . Fully integrated artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes: modular closed-loop glucose control maintains near normoglycemia. Diabetes. 2012; 61(9):2230-7. PMC: 3425406. DOI: 10.2337/db11-1445. View

Ly T, Weinzimer S, Maahs D, Sherr J, Roy A, Grosman B . Automated hybrid closed-loop control with a proportional-integral-derivative based system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes: individualizing settings for optimal performance. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016; 18(5):348-355. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12399. View

Campos-Cornejo F, Campos-Delgado D, Espinoza-Trejo D, Zisser H, Jovanovic L, Doyle 3rd F . An advisory protocol for rapid- and slow-acting insulin therapy based on a run-to-run methodology. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010; 12(7):555-65. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0173. View

Forlenza G, Deshpande S, Ly T, Howsmon D, Cameron F, Baysal N . Application of Zone Model Predictive Control Artificial Pancreas During Extended Use of Infusion Set and Sensor: A Randomized Crossover-Controlled Home-Use Trial. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(8):1096-1102. PMC: 5521973. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-0500. View

Hajizadeh I, Rashid M, Cinar A . Plasma-Insulin-Cognizant Adaptive Model Predictive Control for Artificial Pancreas Systems. J Process Control. 2019; 77:97-113. PMC: 6897508. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.03.009. View

Hovorka R, Canonico V, Chassin L, Haueter U, Massi-Benedetti M, Federici M . Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Physiol Meas. 2004; 25(4):905-20. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/4/010. View

Shi D, Dassau E, Doyle 3rd F . Multivariate learning framework for long-term adaptation in the artificial pancreas. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019; 4(1):61-74. PMC: 6336673. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10119. View

Chakrabarty A, Zavitsanou S, Doyle F, Dassau E . Event-Triggered Model Predictive Control for Embedded Artificial Pancreas Systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017; 65(3):575-586. PMC: 5839516. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2707344. View

Miller S, Nimri R, Atlas E, Grunberg E, Phillip M . Automatic learning algorithm for the MD-logic artificial pancreas system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011; 13(10):983-90. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2010.0216. View

10.

Hajizadeh I, Rashid M, Samadi S, Feng J, Sevil M, Hobbs N . Adaptive and Personalized Plasma Insulin Concentration Estimation for Artificial Pancreas Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018; 12(3):639-649. PMC: 6154239. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818763959. View

11.

Pinsker J, Lee J, Dassau E, Seborg D, Bradley P, Gondhalekar R . Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(7):1135-42. PMC: 4915560. DOI: 10.2337/dc15-2344. View

12.

Laguna Sanz A, Doyle 3rd F, Dassau E . An Enhanced Model Predictive Control for the Artificial Pancreas Using a Confidence Index Based on Residual Analysis of Past Predictions. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11(3):537-544. PMC: 5505428. DOI: 10.1177/1932296816680632. View

13.

Russell S, El-Khatib F, Sinha M, Magyar K, McKeon K, Goergen L . Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(4):313-325. PMC: 4183762. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314474. View

14.

Herrero P, Bondia J, Gimenez M, Oliver N, Georgiou P . Automatic Adaptation of Basal Insulin Using Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018; 12(2):282-294. PMC: 5851242. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818761752. View

15.

Toffanin C, Visentin R, Messori M, Di Palma F, Magni L, Cobelli C . Toward a Run-to-Run Adaptive Artificial Pancreas: In Silico Results. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017; 65(3):479-488. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2652062. View

16.

Hajizadeh I, Rashid M, Turksoy K, Samadi S, Feng J, Sevil M . Incorporating Unannounced Meals and Exercise in Adaptive Learning of Personalized Models for Multivariable Artificial Pancreas Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018; 12(5):953-966. PMC: 6134614. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818789951. View

17.

Shi D, Dassau E, Doyle F . Adaptive Zone Model Predictive Control of Artificial Pancreas Based on Glucose- and Velocity-Dependent Control Penalties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018; 66(4):1045-1054. PMC: 6760658. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2866392. View

18.

Feng J, Hajizadeh I, Yu X, Rashid M, Turksoy K, Samadi S . Multi-level Supervision and Modification of Artificial Pancreas Control System. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 112:57-69. PMC: 6166877. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.02.002. View

19.

Wang Y, Zhang J, Zeng F, Wang N, Chen X, Zhang B . "Learning" Can Improve the Blood Glucose Control Performance for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017; 19(1):41-48. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2016.0328. View

20.

Ramkissoon C, Bertachi A, Beneyto A, Bondia J, Vehi J . Detection and Control of Unannounced Exercise in the Artificial Pancreas Without Additional Physiological Signals. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019; 24(1):259-267. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2898558. View