» Articles » PMID: 31550535

The Crystal Structures of CDD-1, the Intrinsic Class D β-lactamase from the Pathogenic Gram-positive Bacterium Clostridioides Difficile, and Its Complex with Cefotaxime

Overview
Journal J Struct Biol
Date 2019 Sep 25
PMID 31550535
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Class D β-lactamases, enzymes that degrade β-lactam antibiotics and are widely spread in Gram-negative bacteria, were for a long time not known in Gram-positive organisms. Recently, these enzymes were identified in various non-pathogenic Bacillus species and subsequently in Clostridioides difficile, a major clinical pathogen associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Comparison of the BPU-1 enzyme from Bacillus pumilus with the CDD-1 and CDD-2 enzymes from C. difficile demonstrated that the latter enzymes have broadened their substrate profile to efficiently hydrolyze the expanded-spectrum methoxyimino cephalosporins, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. These two antibiotics are major contributors to the development of C. difficile infection, as they suppress sensitive bacterial microflora in the gut but fail to kill the pathogen which is highly resistant to these drugs. To gain insight into the structural features that contribute to the expansion of the substrate profile of CDD enzymes compared to BPU-1, we solved the crystal structures of CDD-1 and its complex with cefotaxime. Comparison of CDD-1 structures with those of class D enzymes from Gram-negative bacteria showed that in the cefotaxime-CDD-1 complex, the antibiotic is bound in a substantially different mode due to structural differences in the enzymes' active sites. We also found that CDD-1 has a uniquely long Ω-loop when compared to all other class D β-lactamases. This Ω-loop extension allows it to engage in hydrogen bonding with the acylated cefotaxime, thus providing additional stabilizing interactions with the substrate which could be responsible for the high catalytic activity of the enzyme for expanded-spectrum cephalosporins.

Citing Articles

Detection and Genomic Characterisation of from Spinach Fields.

Marcos P, Whyte P, Burgess C, Ekhlas D, Bolton D Pathogens. 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 36365061 PMC: 9695345. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11111310.


Time-Resolved Interaction of the CDD-1 enzyme with Avibactam Provides New Insights into the Catalytic Mechanism of Class D β-lactamases.

Stewart N, Toth M, Stasyuk A, Vakulenko S, Smith C ACS Infect Dis. 2021; 7(6):1765-1776.

PMID: 33908775 PMC: 8808381. DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00094.


Inhibition of the Class D β-Lactamase CDD-1 by Avibactam.

Stewart N, Toth M, Stasyuk A, Lee M, Smith C, Vakulenko S ACS Infect Dis. 2021; 7(5):1164-1176.

PMID: 33390002 PMC: 8826747. DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00714.


A surface loop modulates activity of the Bacillus class D β-lactamases.

Stewart N, Bhattacharya M, Toth M, Smith C, Vakulenko S J Struct Biol. 2020; 211(2):107544.

PMID: 32512156 PMC: 7418532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107544.

References
1.
Chen V, Arendall 3rd W, Headd J, Keedy D, Immormino R, Kapral G . MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010; 66(Pt 1):12-21. PMC: 2803126. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444909042073. View

2.
Faraci W, Pratt R . Mechanism of inhibition of the PC1 beta-lactamase of Staphylococcus aureus by cephalosporins: importance of the 3'-leaving group. Biochemistry. 1985; 24(4):903-10. DOI: 10.1021/bi00325a014. View

3.
Toth M, Antunes N, Stewart N, Frase H, Bhattacharya M, Smith C . Class D β-lactamases do exist in Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Chem Biol. 2015; 12(1):9-14. PMC: 4684797. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1950. View

4.
Derewenda Z, Vekilov P . Entropy and surface engineering in protein crystallization. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005; 62(Pt 1):116-24. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444905035237. View

5.
Liebschner D, Afonine P, Moriarty N, Poon B, Sobolev O, Terwilliger T . Polder maps: improving OMIT maps by excluding bulk solvent. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017; 73(Pt 2):148-157. PMC: 5297918. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798316018210. View