Compositional Analysis of Flatworm Genomes Shows Strong Codon Usage Biases Across All Classes
Overview
Affiliations
In the present work, we performed a comparative genome-wide analysis of 22 species representative of the main clades and lifestyles of the phylum Platyhelminthes. We selected a set of 700 orthologous genes conserved in all species, measuring changes in GC content, codon, and amino acid usage in orthologous positions. Values of 3 codon position GC spanned over a wide range, allowing to discriminate two distinctive clusters within freshwater turbellarians, Cestodes and Trematodes respectively. Furthermore, a hierarchical clustering of codon usage data differs remarkably from the phylogenetic tree. Additionally, we detected a synonymous codon usage bias that was more dramatic in extreme GC-poor or GC-rich genomes, i.e., GC-poor Schistosomes preferred to use AT-rich terminated synonymous codons, while GC-rich showed the opposite behavior. Interestingly, these biases impacted the amino acidic usage, with preferred amino acids encoded by codons following the GC content trend. These are associated with non-synonymous substitutions at orthologous positions. The detailed analysis of the synonymous and non-synonymous changes provides evidence for a two-hit mechanism where both mutation and selection forces drive the diverse coding strategies of flatworms.
Base Composition, Codon Usage, and Patterns of Gene Sequence Evolution in Butterflies.
Nasvall K, Boman J, Talla V, Backstrom N Genome Biol Evol. 2023; 15(8).
PMID: 37565492 PMC: 10462419. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evad150.
Codon Usage Bias Correlates With Gene Length in Neurodegeneration Associated Genes.
Khandia R, Saeed M, Alharbi A, Ashraf G, Greig N, Kamal M Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:895607.
PMID: 35860292 PMC: 9289476. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.895607.
Codon usage bias and dinucleotide preference in 29 Drosophila species.
Kokate P, Techtmann S, Werner T G3 (Bethesda). 2021; 11(8).
PMID: 34849812 PMC: 8496323. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab191.
Atopkin D, Semenchenko A, Solodovnik D, Ivashko Y, Vinnikov K Parasitol Res. 2021; 120(6):2037-2046.
PMID: 33893550 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07159-y.