» Articles » PMID: 31540297

Assessing and Enhancing the Welfare of Animals with Equivocal and Reliable Cues

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Sep 22
PMID 31540297
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The actions of human caretakers strongly influence animals living under human care. Here, we consider how intentional and unintentional signals provided by caretakers can inform our assessment of animals' well-being as well as help to support it. Our aim is to assist in further developing techniques to learn animals' affective state from their behavior and to provide simple suggestions for how animal caretakers' behavior can support animal welfare. We suggest that anticipatory behavior towards expected rewards is related to decision-making behavior as viewed through the cognitive bias lens. By considering the predictions of the theories associated with anticipatory behavior and cognitive bias, we propose to use specific cues to probe the cumulative affective state of animals. Additionally, our commentary draws on the logic of reward sensitivity and judgement bias theories to develop a framework that suggests how reliable and equivocal signals may influence animals' affective states. Application of this framework may be useful in supporting the welfare of animals in human care.

Citing Articles

Anticipatory Behaviour During the Approach to Feeding Times as a Measure of Horse Welfare.

Mata F, Boyton G, Young T Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765580 PMC: 11672559. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243677.


Space, time, and context drive anticipatory behavior: Considerations for understanding the behavior of animals in human care.

Krebs B, Chudeau K, Eschmann C, Tu C, Pacheco E, Watters J Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:972217.

PMID: 36148468 PMC: 9485936. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.972217.


Human interventions in a behavioural experiment for Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus).

Chu P, Wierucka K, Murphy D, Tilley H, Mumby H Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(2):393-404.

PMID: 35987800 PMC: 9392510. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01668-8.


Pasture access and eye temperature in dairy cows.

Crump A, Jenkins K, Bethell E, Ferris C, Arnott G J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2022; 27(2):234-242.

PMID: 35416093 PMC: 11789712. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2022.2063020.

References
1.
Balsam P, Sanchez-Castillo H, Taylor K, Van Volkinburg H, Ward R . Timing and anticipation: conceptual and methodological approaches. Eur J Neurosci. 2009; 30(9):1749-55. PMC: 2791343. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06967.x. View

2.
Panksepp J . The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: do animals have affective lives?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35(9):1791-804. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.003. View

3.
Watters J, Miller J, Sullivan T . Note on optimizing environmental enrichment: a study of fennec fox and zoo guests. Zoo Biol. 2011; 30(6):647-54. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20365. View

4.
Makowska I, Weary D . Differences in Anticipatory Behaviour between Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Housed in Standard versus Semi-Naturalistic Laboratory Environments. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0147595. PMC: 4731070. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147595. View

5.
Cockerham W . Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. J Health Soc Behav. 2005; 46(1):51-67. DOI: 10.1177/002214650504600105. View