» Articles » PMID: 36148468

Space, Time, and Context Drive Anticipatory Behavior: Considerations for Understanding the Behavior of Animals in Human Care

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36148468
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal-based measures reflecting the welfare state of individuals are critical for ensuring the well-being of animals under human care. Anticipatory behavior is one potential animal-based measure that has gained traction in recent years, as it is theorized to relate to animals' reward sensitivity. It is of particular interest as an assessment for animals living under human care, as the predictability of the captive environment lends itself to the development of this class of behaviors. Animals are likely to exhibit anticipation in locations related to the anticipated event, often in temporally predictable time frames, and before specific contexts they experience in their day-to-day management. In this sense and under certain circumstances, anticipatory behaviors are likely to drive observed behavioral or space use patterns of animals under human care. Drawing conclusions from such data without identifying anticipation may result in misleading conclusions. Here we discuss how space, time, and context are related to patterns of anticipatory behaviors in animals under human care, how unidentified anticipation may alter conclusions regarding animal behavior or welfare under certain circumstances.

Citing Articles

Anticipatory Behaviour During the Approach to Feeding Times as a Measure of Horse Welfare.

Mata F, Boyton G, Young T Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765580 PMC: 11672559. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243677.


Zoo Animal Welfare Assessment: Where Do We Stand?.

Tallo-Parra O, Salas M, Manteca X Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 37370476 PMC: 10294817. DOI: 10.3390/ani13121966.

References
1.
Balsam P, Sanchez-Castillo H, Taylor K, Van Volkinburg H, Ward R . Timing and anticipation: conceptual and methodological approaches. Eur J Neurosci. 2009; 30(9):1749-55. PMC: 2791343. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06967.x. View

2.
Sherwen S, Hemsworth L, Beausoleil N, Embury A, Mellor D . An Animal Welfare Risk Assessment Process for Zoos. Animals (Basel). 2018; 8(8). PMC: 6116011. DOI: 10.3390/ani8080130. View

3.
Alcaro A, Panksepp J . The SEEKING mind: primal neuro-affective substrates for appetitive incentive states and their pathological dynamics in addictions and depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35(9):1805-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.002. View

4.
Rose P, Scales J, Brereton J . Why the "Visitor Effect" Is Complicated. Unraveling Individual Animal, Visitor Number, and Climatic Influences on Behavior, Space Use and Interactions With Keepers-A Case Study on Captive Hornbills. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:236. PMC: 7199352. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00236. View

5.
Van den Berg C, Pijlman F, Koning H, Diergaarde L, van Ree J, Spruijt B . Isolation changes the incentive value of sucrose and social behaviour in juvenile and adult rats. Behav Brain Res. 1999; 106(1-2):133-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00099-6. View