Patellar Calcar: Morphometric Analysis by Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-dimensional Reconstruction Software-assisted

Overview

Journal Surg Radiol Anat

Specialties Anatomy & Histology
General Surgery
Radiology

Date 2019 Sep 19

PMID 31529166

Authors

Sergio Benavente

Joaquin Villagra

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Patellar calcar corresponds to a greater trabecular bone density area in the patella lateral facet, whose morphometry is uncertain. This study aimed to describe patellar calcar morphometry by knee MRI and develop a 3D reconstruction software-assisted.

Materials And Methods: Consecutive adult patients, submitted to knee MRI, between 2014 and 2017, were entered in IMPAX software. Exclusion criteria are history of patellar surgical intervention, trauma, chondromalacia, bone edema or bipartite patella. All MRI images were retrospectively reviewed by three readers. MRI patellar calcar measurements are height, width, thickness and posterior distance. 3D model protocol reconstruction: 3D Slicer software was used to design a preliminary model for each patient, and then all were automatically merged into one, which was finalized using the software segmentation tools. For 3D patellar calcar location, the transpolar axis was designed.

Results: 250 MRI were analyzed, patellar calcar was present in 208 (83.2%); 101 men and 107 women. Mean age was 44.3 ± 15.6 years.

Measurements: height 13.84 ± 2.42 mm (male: 14.50 ± 2.42; female: 13.21 ± 2.26) (p < 0.0001), width 12.21 ± 2.26 mm (male 13.14 ± 2.22; female 11.33 ± 1.93) (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference of thickness 0.56 ± 0.22 mm (male: 0.56 ± 0.25; female: 0.56 ± 0.20) and posterior distance 2.37 ± 0.80 mm (male: 2.46 ± 0.89; female: 2.29 ± 0.69) between genders was found. 3D model results: transpolar axis went through the patellar calcar in all the cases.

Conclusions: This study shows in a 3D model reconstruction, what was previously described in the literature, determining for the first time the patellar calcar morphometry in the knee MRI and identifying it as a regular finding in this imaging test.

References

Toumi H, Higashiyama I, Suzuki D, Kumai T, Bydder G, McGonagle D . Regional variations in human patellar trabecular architecture and the structure of the proximal patellar tendon enthesis. J Anat. 2006; 208(1):47-57. PMC: 2100185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00501.x. View

Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N, Schulte E, Wimmer B . Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints. Skeletal Radiol. 1989; 18(7):507-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00351749. View

Seisler A, Sheehan F . Normative three-dimensional patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic, in vivo study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007; 54(7):1333-41. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.890735. View

Salsich G, Ward S, Terk M, Powers C . In vivo assessment of patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals who are pain free. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (417):277-84. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093024.56370.79. View

Grelsamer R, Klein J . The biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998; 28(5):286-98. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.5.286. View

Eckstein F, Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R . Distribution of subchondral bone density and cartilage thickness in the human patella. J Anat. 1992; 180 ( Pt 3):425-33. PMC: 1259644. View

Collins M, Tiegs-Heiden C, Stuart M . Patellar calcar: MRI appearance of a previously undescribed anatomical entity. Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 43(2):219-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1776-3. View

Heegaard J, Leyvraz P, Curnier A, Rakotomanana L, Huiskes R . The biomechanics of the human patella during passive knee flexion. J Biomech. 1995; 28(11):1265-79. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00059-q. View

Eckstein F, Milz S, Anetzberger H, Putz R . Thickness of the subchondral mineralised tissue zone (SMZ) in normal male and female and pathological human patellae. J Anat. 1998; 192 ( Pt 1):81-90. PMC: 1467741. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19210081.x. View

10.

Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N, Schulte E, Wimmer B . [Demonstration of subchondral density pattern using CT-osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) for the assessment of individual joint stress in live patients]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1990; 128(2):128-33. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039487. View

11.

Burr D, Martin R, Schaffler M, Radin E . Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech. 1985; 18(3):189-200. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90204-0. View

12.

Amis A, Senavongse W, Bull A . Patellofemoral kinematics during knee flexion-extension: an in vitro study. J Orthop Res. 2006; 24(12):2201-11. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20268. View

13.

Toumi H, Larguech G, Filaire E, Pinti A, Lespessailles E . Regional variations in human patellar trabecular architecture and the structure of the quadriceps enthesis: a cadaveric study. J Anat. 2012; 220(6):632-7. PMC: 3390516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01500.x. View

14.

Hefzy M, Jackson W, Saddemi S, HSIEH Y . Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas. J Biomed Eng. 1992; 14(4):329-43. DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(92)90008-9. View

15.

Hoechel S, Schulz G, Muller-Gerbl M . Insight into the 3D-trabecular architecture of the human patella. Ann Anat. 2015; 200:98-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.02.007. View

16.

Fox A, Wanivenhaus F, Rodeo S . The basic science of the patella: structure, composition, and function. J Knee Surg. 2012; 25(2):127-41. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313741. View

17.

Borotikar B, Sheehan F . In vivo patellofemoral contact mechanics during active extension using a novel dynamic MRI-based methodology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(12):1886-1894. PMC: 5548374. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.08.023. View

18.

Hoechel S, Wirz D, Muller-Gerbl M . Density and strength distribution in the human subchondral bone plate of the patella. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(9):1827-34. PMC: 3427435. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1545-2. View

19.

Ahmed A, Burke D . In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints--Part I: Tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983; 105(3):216-25. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138409. View

20.

Hehne H . Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint and its clinical relevance. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (258):73-85. View