» Articles » PMID: 24012620

In Vivo Patellofemoral Contact Mechanics During Active Extension Using a Novel Dynamic MRI-based Methodology

Overview
Date 2013 Sep 10
PMID 24012620
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To establish an in vivo, normative patellofemoral (PF) cartilage contact mechanics database acquired during voluntary muscle control using a novel, dynamic, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based, computational methodology and validate the contact mechanics sensitivity to the known sub-millimeter methodological accuracies.

Design: Dynamic cine phase-contrast and multi-plane cine (MPC) images were acquired while female subjects (n = 20, sample of convenience) performed an open kinetic chain (knee flexion-extension) exercise inside a 3-T MR scanner. Static cartilage models were created from high resolution three-dimensional static MR data and accurately placed in their dynamic pose at each time frame based on the cine-PC (CPC) data. Cartilage contact parameters were calculated based on the surface overlap. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and a one-sample repeated measures ANOVA. The sensitivity of the contact parameters to the known errors in the PF kinematics was determined.

Results: Peak mean PF contact area was 228.7 ± 173.6 mm(2) at 40° knee angle. During extension, contact centroid and peak strain locations tracked medially on the femoral and patellar cartilage and were not significantly different from each other. At 25°, 30°, 35°, and 40° of knee extension, contact area was significantly different. Contact area and centroid locations were insensitive to rotational and translational perturbations.

Conclusion: This study is a first step towards unfolding the biomechanical pathways to anterior PF pain and osteoarthritis (OA) using dynamic, in vivo, and accurate methodologies. The database provides crucial data for future studies and for validation of, or as an input to, computational models.

Citing Articles

Combining advanced computational and imaging techniques as a quantitative tool to estimate patellofemoral joint stress during downhill gait: A feasibility study.

Gustafson J, Elias J, Fitzgerald G, Tashman S, Debski R, Farrokhi S Gait Posture. 2020; 84:31-37.

PMID: 33264730 PMC: 7902369. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.11.016.


Patellar calcar: morphometric analysis by knee magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction software-assisted.

Benavente S, Villagra J Surg Radiol Anat. 2019; 41(12):1483-1488.

PMID: 31529166 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02337-1.


Biomaterials to Mimic and Heal Connective Tissues.

Freedman B, Mooney D Adv Mater. 2019; 31(19):e1806695.

PMID: 30908806 PMC: 6504615. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201806695.


American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Vignos M, Kaiser J, Baer G, Kijowski R, Thelen D Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018; 56:75-83.

PMID: 29852331 PMC: 6004264. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.05.008.


In vivo comparison of medialized dome and anatomic patellofemoral geometries using subject-specific computational modeling.

Ali A, Mannen E, Rullkoetter P, Shelburne K J Orthop Res. 2018; 36(7):1910-1918.

PMID: 29411900 PMC: 6081258. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23865.


References
1.
Goudakos I, Konig C, Schottle P, Taylor W, Singh N, Roberts I . Stair climbing results in more challenging patellofemoral contact mechanics and kinematics than walking at early knee flexion under physiological-like quadriceps loading. J Biomech. 2009; 42(15):2590-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.007. View

2.
Behnam A, Herzka D, Sheehan F . Assessing the accuracy and precision of musculoskeletal motion tracking using cine-PC MRI on a 3.0T platform. J Biomech. 2010; 44(1):193-7. PMC: 3236440. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.029. View

3.
Bey M, Kline S, Tashman S, Zauel R . Accuracy of biplane x-ray imaging combined with model-based tracking for measuring in-vivo patellofemoral joint motion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008; 3:38. PMC: 2538511. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-38. View

4.
Anderson A, Ellis B, Maas S, Peters C, Weiss J . Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressure in the human hip joint. J Biomech Eng. 2008; 130(5):051008. PMC: 2840996. DOI: 10.1115/1.2953472. View

5.
Milentijevic D, Torzilli P . Influence of stress rate on water loss, matrix deformation and chondrocyte viability in impacted articular cartilage. J Biomech. 2005; 38(3):493-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.016. View