» Articles » PMID: 31507401

Automated Instability Detection for Interactive Myocontrol of Prosthetic Hands

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 12
PMID 31507401
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Myocontrol is control of a prosthetic device using data obtained from (residual) muscle activity. In most myocontrol prosthetic systems, such biological data also denote the subject's intent: reliably interpreting what the user wants to do, exactly and only when she wants, is paramount to avoid instability, which can potentially lead to accidents, humiliation and trauma. Indeed, instability manifests itself as a of the myocontrol in interpreting the subject's intent, and the automated detection of such failures can be a specific step to improve myocontrol of prostheses-e.g., enabling the possibility of self-adaptation of the system via on-demand model updates for incremental learning, i.e., the interactive myocontrol paradigm. In this work we engaged six expert myocontrol users (five able-bodied subjects and one trans-radial amputee) in a simple, clear grasp-carry-release task, in which the subject's intent was reasonably determined by the task itself. We then manually ascertained when the intent would not coincide with the behavior of the prosthetic device, i.e., we labeled the failures of the myocontrol system. Lastly, we trained and tested a classifier to automatically detect such failures. Our results show that a standard classifier is able to detect myocontrol failures with a mean balanced error rate of 18.86% over all subjects. If confirmed in the large, this approach could pave the way to self-detection and correction of myocontrol errors, a tighter man-machine co-adaptation, and in the end the improvement of the reliability of myocontrol.

Citing Articles

The Merits of Dynamic Data Acquisition for Realistic Myocontrol.

Gigli A, Gijsberts A, Castellini C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:361.

PMID: 32426344 PMC: 7203421. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00361.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Hargrove L, Scheme E, Englehart K, Hudgins B . Multiple binary classifications via linear discriminant analysis for improved controllability of a powered prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010; 18(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2039590. View

3.
Merletti R, Botter A, Cescon C, Minetto M, Vieira T . Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in clinical research applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2010; 38(4):347-79. DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v38.i4.20. View

4.
Scheme E, Englehart K, Hudgins B . Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011; 58(6):1698-705. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2113182. View

5.
Fougner A, Scheme E, Chan A, Englehart K, Stavdahl O . Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011; 19(6):644-51. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2163529. View