» Articles » PMID: 31486888

Demographic Benefits of Early Season Resources for Bumble Bee (B. Vosnesenskii) Colonies

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2019 Sep 6
PMID 31486888
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The temporal distribution of resources is an important aspect of habitat quality that can substantially impact population success. Although it is widely accepted that floral resources directly influence wild bee population sizes, we lack experimental data evaluating how resource availability affects colony growth via demographic mechanisms. To achieve this, we tracked marked individuals in bumble bee (Bombus vosnesenskii) colonies to evaluate whether worker survival and reproduction responded to experimentally elevated forage early in colony development. Specifically, we assessed the effect of early resource environment on worker and sexual offspring production, and the survival and body size of individual workers. We also assessed whether responses of colonies differed when exposed to higher or lower resource environments at a relatively smaller (~ 10 workers) or larger (~ 20 workers) size. Resource supplementation always resulted in greater total offspring and male production; however, the influence of supplementation on worker production and quality depended on colony size at the start of supplementation. Among colonies that were initially smaller, colonies that were supplemented produced fewer but larger bodied and longer lived workers compared to control counterparts. Among colonies that were initially larger, colonies that were supplemented produced more workers than corresponding controls, but without changes to worker quality. Collectively, these results provide clear experimental evidence that greater resource availability early in colony development increases overall productivity, and indicate that colonies may pursue different allocation strategies in response to the resource environment, investing in more or better workers.

Citing Articles

Leaf-damaging behavior by queens is widespread among bumblebee species.

Flury P, Stade S, De Moraes C, Mescher M Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):435.

PMID: 40082690 PMC: 11906820. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07670-3.


Wild Foundress Queen Bumble Bees Make Numerous, Short Foraging Trips and Exhibit Frequent Nest Failure: Insights From Trap-Nesting and RFID Tracking.

Gustilo E, Grover W, Woodard S Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e71016.

PMID: 39991447 PMC: 11843468. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71016.


Morphological Variation in Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) After Three Decades of an Island Invasion.

Kardum Hjort C, Smith H, Allen A, Dudaniec R J Insect Sci. 2023; 23(1).

PMID: 36856678 PMC: 9972831. DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iead006.


Positive impact of postfire environment on bumble bees not explained by habitat variables in a remote forested ecosystem.

Johnson S, Jackson H, Noth H, MGonigle L Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(1):e9743.

PMID: 36713490 PMC: 9873587. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9743.


Bumble Bee () Queen Nest Searching Occurs Independent of Ovary Developmental Status.

Sarro E, Tripodi A, Woodard S Integr Org Biol. 2022; 4(1):obac007.

PMID: 35274079 PMC: 8902787. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obac007.


References
1.
Lindstrom . Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14(9):343-348. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01639-0. View

2.
Hagler J, Jackson C . Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000; 46:511-43. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.511. View

3.
Metcalfe N, Monaghan P . Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(5):254-260. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02124-3. View

4.
Haywood S, Perrins C . Is clutch size in birds affected by environmental conditions during growth?. Proc Biol Sci. 1992; 249(1325):195-7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0103. View

5.
Memmott J, Waser N, Price M . Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1557):2605-11. PMC: 1691904. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909. View