» Articles » PMID: 31483830

Does Numerical Similarity Alter Age-related Distractibility in Working Memory?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Sep 5
PMID 31483830
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Similarity between targets and distracters is a key factor in generating distractibility, and exerts a large detrimental effect on aging. The present EEG study tested the role of a new stimulus dimension in generating distractibility in visual Working Memory (vWM), namely numerical similarity. In a change detection paradigm a varying number of relevant and irrelevant stimuli were presented simultaneously in opposite hemifields. Behavioral results indicated that young participants outperformed older individuals; however, in both groups numerical similarity per se did not modulate performance. At the electrophysiological level, in young participants the Contralateral Delay Activity (CDA, a proxy for item maintenance in vWM) was modulated by the numerosity of the relevant items regardless of numerical similarity. In older participants, the CDA was modulated by target numerosity only in the same numerical condition, where the total number of (relevant and irrelevant) items increased with increasing target numerosities. No effect was present in the dissimilar numerical condition, where the total number of items did not vary substantially across target numerosity. This pattern was suggestive of an age-related effect of the total number of (relevant and irrelevant) items on vWM. The additional analyses on alpha-band lateralization measures support this interpretation by revealing that older adults lacked selective deployment of attentional and vWM resources towards the relevant hemifield. Overall, the results indicate that, while numerical similarity does not modulate distractibility, there is an age-related redistribution of vWM resources across the two visual fields, ultimately leading to a general decrease in task performance of older adults.

Citing Articles

Aging and feature binding in visual working memory.

Holcomb A, Tagliabue C, Mazza V Front Psychol. 2022; 13:977565.

PMID: 36275238 PMC: 9583905. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977565.


Training attentive individuation leads to visuo-spatial working memory improvement in low-performing older adults: An online study.

Tagliabue C, Varesio G, Mazza V Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(8):2507-2518.

PMID: 36192602 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02580-6.


Inter- and Intra-Hemispheric Age-Related Remodeling in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory.

Tagliabue C, Varesio G, Mazza V Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 13:807907.

PMID: 35111040 PMC: 8803153. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.807907.


What Can Neural Activity Tell Us About Cognitive Resources in Aging?.

Tagliabue C, Mazza V Front Psychol. 2021; 12:753423.

PMID: 34733219 PMC: 8558238. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753423.


Learning by task repetition enhances object individuation and memorization in the elderly.

Tagliabue C, Assecondi S, Cristoforetti G, Mazza V Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):19957.

PMID: 33203888 PMC: 7673120. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75297-x.

References
1.
Proulx M, Egeth H . Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006; 13(3):524-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193880. View

2.
Scialfa C, Esau S, Joffe K . Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search. Exp Aging Res. 1998; 24(4):337-58. DOI: 10.1080/036107398244184. View

3.
Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A . Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2002; 22(6):443-7. DOI: 10.1007/s100720200003. View

4.
Fukuda K, Kang M, Woodman G . Distinct neural mechanisms for spatially lateralized and spatially global visual working memory representations. J Neurophysiol. 2016; 116(4):1715-1727. PMC: 5144708. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00991.2015. View

5.
Monaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo G . Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci. 2012; 34(5):749-54. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x. View