» Articles » PMID: 31462908

Considering Culture, Context and Community in MhGAP Implementation and Training: Challenges and Recommendations from the Field

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Aug 30
PMID 31462908
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Major efforts are underway to improve access to mental health care in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) including systematic training of non-specialized health professionals and other care providers to identify and help individuals with mental disorders. In many LMIC, this effort is guided by the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) established by the World Health Organization, and commonly centres around one tool in this program: the mhGAP-Intervention Guide.

Objective: To identify cultural and contextual challenges in mhGAP training and implementation and potential strategies for mitigation.

Method: An informal consultative approach was used to analyze the authors' combined field experience in the practice of mhGAP implementation and training. We employed iterative thematic analysis to consolidate and refine lessons, challenges and recommendations through multiple drafts. Findings were organized into categories according to specific challenges, lessons learned and recommendations for future practice. We aimed to identify cross-cutting and recurrent issues.

Results: Based on intensive fieldwork experience with a focus on capacity building, we identify six major sets of challenges: (i) cultural differences in explanations of and attitudes toward mental disorder; (ii) the structure of the local health-care system; (iii) the level of supervision and support available post-training; (iv) the level of previous education, knowledge and skills of trainees; (v) the process of recruitment of trainees; and (vi) the larger socio-political context. Approaches to addressing these problems include: (1) cultural and contextual adaptation of training activities, (2) meaningful stakeholder and community engagement, and (3) processes that provide support to trainees, such as ongoing supervision and Communities of Practice.

Conclusion: Contextual and cultural factors present major barriers to mhGAP implementation and sustainability of improved services. To enable trainees to effectively apply their local cultural knowledge, mhGAP training needs to: (1) address assumptions, biases and stigma associated with mental health symptoms and problems; (2) provide an explicit framework to guide the integration of cultural knowledge into assessment, treatment negotiation, and delivery; and (3) address the specific kinds of problems, modes of clinical presentations and social predicaments seen in the local population. Continued research is needed to assess the effectiveness these strategies.

Citing Articles

Implementation of the Community Component of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): A Scoping Review.

Agudelo-Hernandez F, Giraldo-Alvarez A Public Health Rev. 2025; 46:1607759.

PMID: 40071153 PMC: 11893325. DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607759.


Factors influencing the level of patients' satisfaction with mental healthcare delivery in Tamale Metropolis: a multicentre cross-sectional study.

Dokurugu M, Aninanya G, Alhassan M, Dowou R, Daliri D BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):299.

PMID: 39987093 PMC: 11846403. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12432-2.


"Space to see the future"? A political economy analysis of child and adolescent mental health and well-being in Ethiopia including routes for change.

Engdawork K, DAmbruoso L, Hailu T, Yared M, Geletu G, Baraki S Front Sociol. 2025; 9:1488619.

PMID: 39981005 PMC: 11841411. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1488619.


Feasibility and cross-cultural validation of an adapted social skills group training programme (KONTAKT CHILD) for Chinese autistic children: a waitlist RCT protocol.

Lao U, Zhu H, Liang F, Bai W, Yin P, Huang X BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e081827.

PMID: 39510775 PMC: 11552573. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081827.


Identifying contextual barriers and facilitators in implementing non-specialist interventions for mental health in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study with mental health workers and community members.

Wijekoon Mudiyanselage K, Jorg F, Mendis M, Fuhr D, Busse H Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024; 11:e76.

PMID: 39464551 PMC: 11504943. DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.75.


References
1.
Epping-Jordan J, van Ommeren M, Ashour H, Maramis A, Marini A, Mohanraj A . Beyond the crisis: building back better mental health care in 10 emergency-affected areas using a longer-term perspective. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015; 9:15. PMC: 4406120. DOI: 10.1186/s13033-015-0007-9. View

2.
Kleinman A, Lockwood Estrin G, Usmani S, Chisholm D, Marquez P, Evans T . Time for mental health to come out of the shadows. Lancet. 2016; 387(10035):2274-2275. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30655-9. View

3.
Kirmayer L . Cultural variations in the response to psychiatric disorders and emotional distress. Soc Sci Med. 1989; 29(3):327-39. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90281-5. View

4.
Mills C, Hilberg E . 'Built for expansion': the 'social life' of the WHO's mental health GAP Intervention Guide. Sociol Health Illn. 2019; 41 Suppl 1:162-175. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12870. View

5.
Kirmayer L, Minas H . The future of cultural psychiatry: an international perspective. Can J Psychiatry. 2000; 45(5):438-46. DOI: 10.1177/070674370004500503. View