» Articles » PMID: 31452924

Biofilm Development is Governed by Cooperative Attachment and Adhesion Maintenance Proteins

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 28
PMID 31452924
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The opportunistic fungal pathogen is capable of adhering to the oral mucosa despite forces created by salivary flow. Although many fungal adhesion proteins have been identified, less is known about the temporal development of cell adhesion and biofilm growth in a flow environment. In this study, we use a flow system with real-time imaging of cells as they adhere and grow. Rates of cell attachment and dispersion of knockout strains of putative adhesins, transcription factors, and deletions with a hyperfilamentous phenotype were quantified during 18 h of biofilm development. Cell adhesion under flow is a multi-phase process initiated with cell rolling, then an initial firm attachment to the substrate occurs. After attachment, cells enter a growth phase where cells either commit to adherence or disperse. Δ, Δ, Δ, and Δ cells had significantly reduced initial attachment and subsequent adhesion, while Δ/Δ had no change in initial attachment but reduced adhesion maintenance. WT cells had increased adhesion during the late growth phase when hyphae were more highly expressed. Hyperfilamentous strains had 10-fold higher total biofilm growth, a result of significantly reduced detachment rates, showing that hyphal morphogenesis is important for adhesion maintenance in the developing biofilm. The rate of biomass dispersion was most important for determining the density of the mature biomass. Adhesion maintenance was mediated in part by Ywp1, a protein previously thought to regulate dispersion, thus it functions as an adhesion maintenance protein in .

Citing Articles

Retinoids as Alternative Antifungal Agents Against : and Evidence.

Cosio T, Romeo A, Pistoia E, Pica F, Freni C, Iacovelli F Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005604 PMC: 11857849. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020237.


Antifungal efficacy of Citrusfusion mediated silver nanoparticles in Candida species.

Harine A, Ranjani S, Hemalatha S BMC Biotechnol. 2025; 25(1):18.

PMID: 39979871 PMC: 11841014. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-025-00952-y.


Rosmarinic Acid Exhibits Antifungal and Antibiofilm Activities Against : Insights into Gene Expression and Morphological Changes.

Aydin M, Unusan N, Sumlu E, Korucu E J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(11).

PMID: 39590670 PMC: 11595412. DOI: 10.3390/jof10110751.


Benzyldimethyldodecyl Ammonium Chloride-Doped Denture-Based Resin: Impact on Strength, Surface Properties, Antifungal Activities, and In Silico Molecular Docking Analysis.

Aldulaijan S, Alruwili R, Almulaify R, Alhassan F, Al-Dulaijan Y, Alshahrani F J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452608 PMC: 11508443. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15100310.


Sinefungin, a natural nucleoside analog of S-adenosyl methionine, impairs the pathogenicity of .

Nayak A, Khedri A, Chavarria A, Sanders K, Ghalei H, Khoshnevis S NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2024; 2(1).

PMID: 39268078 PMC: 11391927. DOI: 10.1038/s44259-024-00040-9.


References
1.
Lo W, Dranginis A . The cell surface flocculin Flo11 is required for pseudohyphae formation and invasion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 1998; 9(1):161-71. PMC: 25236. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.9.1.161. View

2.
McCall A, Edgerton M . Real-Time Approach to Flow Cell Imaging of Candida albicans Biofilm Development. J Fungi (Basel). 2018; 3(1). PMC: 5715965. DOI: 10.3390/jof3010013. View

3.
Granger B, Flenniken M, Davis D, Mitchell A, Cutler J . Yeast wall protein 1 of Candida albicans. Microbiology (Reading). 2005; 151(Pt 5):1631-1644. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27663-0. View

4.
Navarathna D, Munasinghe J, Lizak M, Nayak D, McGavern D, Roberts D . MRI confirms loss of blood-brain barrier integrity in a mouse model of disseminated candidiasis. NMR Biomed. 2013; 26(9):1125-34. PMC: 3744627. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.2926. View

5.
Hill J, Myers A, Koerner T, Tzagoloff A . Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986; 2(3):163-7. DOI: 10.1002/yea.320020304. View