Correlation of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) with Other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Overview

Journal Arch Bone Jt Surg

Date 2019 Aug 27

PMID 31448305

Citations 14

Authors

Casey M OConnor

David Ring

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, one-question patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). We systematically reviewed correlations between SANE and more extensive PROMs.

Methods: We identified studies with correlation coefficients between SANE and other shoulder, knee, and ankle-specific PROMs. We calculated mean, median and range across studies and time points of data collection.

Results: Eleven studies provided 14 correlations, six shoulder-specific PROMs in four studies, six knee-specific PROMs in six studies and two ankle specific PROMs in one study. The mean correlation comparing SANE and knee-specific PROMs was 0.60 (SD 0.24), median 0.66, and range 0.12 to 0.88. Among studies comparing SANE and shoulder-specific PROMs mean correlation was 0.59 (SD 0.20), median 0.62 and range 0.20 to 0.89. The mean correlation between SANE and ankle-specific PROMs was 0.69 (SD 0.17), median 0.69 and range 0.75 to 0.81.

Conclusion: There seems to be moderate correlation amongst PROMs, even those that are a single question. Future research might address whether patient reported outcome measure a common underlying construct even when they consist of a single question.

Citing Articles

Meniscal repair with concomitant suture-augmented ACL repair versus reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

Garside J, Bellaire C, Perraut G, Argintar E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):79.

PMID: 40009107 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04203-w.

Denervation procedure of the lateral epicondyle for refractory lateral epicondylitis.

Suri M, Verma A, OQuin C, Parker G, Mohamed K, Starring H JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):226-230.

PMID: 39898208 PMC: 11784271. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.019.

Non-operative treatment in advanced atraumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head in patients under 50 years old: an observational study.

Lim J, Do W, Chang H, Yoon T, Chun Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31587.

PMID: 39738150 PMC: 11685932. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79669-5.

Innovations in Genicular Outcomes Registry (IGOR): protocol for a real-world registry study of treatments for knee osteoarthritis.

Dasa V, Mihalko W, Rivadeneyra A, Urban J, Wickline A, Rogenmoser D Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024; 16:1759720X241304193.

PMID: 39691173 PMC: 11650579. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X241304193.

Outcomes of medial collateral ligament reconstruction with suture-augmented semitendinosus autograft.

Garside J, Bellaire C, Birhiray D, Kirloskar K, Argintar E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):14.

PMID: 39567400 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04129-9.

References

Williams G, Gangel T, Arciero R, Uhorchak J, Taylor D . Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27(2):214-21. DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270021701. View

Wolfe F . Determinants of WOMAC function, pain and stiffness scores: evidence for the role of low back pain, symptom counts, fatigue and depression in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999; 38(4):355-61. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.4.355. View

Williams G, Taylor D, Gangel T, Uhorchak J, Arciero R . Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and the Lysholm score. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (373):184-92. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200004000-00022. View

Escobar A, Quintana J, Bilbao A, Azkarate J, Guenaga J . Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clin Rheumatol. 2002; 21(6):466-71. DOI: 10.1007/s100670200117. View

Hunt S, Sherman O . Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with correlation of outcome scoring systems. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(4):360-7. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50047. View

Sharma L, Cahue S, Song J, Hayes K, Pai Y, Dunlop D . Physical functioning over three years in knee osteoarthritis: role of psychosocial, local mechanical, and neuromuscular factors. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48(12):3359-70. DOI: 10.1002/art.11420. View

Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg S . Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464:21-6. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c032. View

Taylor D, Posner M, Curl W, Feagin J . Isolated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: over 30-year follow-up of patients treated with arthrotomy and primary repair. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 37(1):65-71. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508325660. View

Clarke M, Dewing C, Schroder D, Solomon D, Provencher M . Normal shoulder outcome score values in the young, active adult. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(3):424-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.009. View

10.

Shelbourne K, Barnes A, Gray T . Correlation of a single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) rating with modified Cincinnati knee rating system and IKDC subjective total scores for patients after ACL reconstruction or knee arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(11):2487-91. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512458576. View

11.

Bradbury M, Brosky Jr J, Walker J, West K . Relationship between scores from the Knee Outcome Survey and a single assessment numerical rating in patients with patellofemoral pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013; 29(7):531-5. DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2012.762077. View

12.

Giesinger J, Kuster M, Behrend H, Giesinger K . Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11:64. PMC: 3639925. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-64. View

13.

Hunt K, Hurwit D . Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(16):e118(1-9). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01476. View

14.

Schmidt S, Ferrer M, Gonzalez M, Gonzalez N, Valderas J, Alonso J . Evaluation of shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic and standardized comparison of available evidence. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(3):434-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.029. View

15.

Winterstein A, McGuine T, Carr K, Hetzel S . Comparison of IKDC and SANE Outcome Measures Following Knee Injury in Active Female Patients. Sports Health. 2014; 5(6):523-9. PMC: 3806180. DOI: 10.1177/1941738113499300. View

16.

Cunningham G, Ladermann A, Denard P, Kherad O, Burkhart S . Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(9):1688-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.010. View

17.

Lyman S, Hidaka C . Patient-Reported Outcome Measures-What Data Do We Really Need?. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(6):1144-1147. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.073. View

18.

Brodke D, Saltzman C, Brodke D . PROMIS for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24(11):744-749. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404. View

19.

Edmonds E, Bastrom T, Roocroft J, Calandra-Young V, Pennock A . The Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Survey (PASS): A Reliable Youth Questionnaire With Discriminant Validity and Responsiveness to Change. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(3):2325967117698466. PMC: 5400147. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117698466. View

20.

Pietrosimone B, Luc B, Duncan A, Saliba S, Hart J, Ingersoll C . Association Between the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. J Athl Train. 2017; 52(6):526-533. PMC: 5488843. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.5.07. View