» Articles » PMID: 10810476

Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Method and the Lysholm Score

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2000 May 16
PMID 10810476
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between the Lysholm knee score and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method. Between March 1995 and December 1996, 201 followup examinations were performed on 130 college age patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. These 201 examinations were divided into five routine followup categories: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and greater than 2 years. The Lysholm score from each patient's followup questionnaire was correlated with his or her Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation rating, as determined by his or her written response to the following question: On a scale from zero to 100, how would you rate your knee today (100 being normal)? All data were gathered prospectively. The mean Lysholm scores and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation ratings ranged from 84.0 to 93.4 points and 80.0 to 93.3 points, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the Lysholm scores and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation ratings ranged from 0.58 to 0.87 points. The results of this study indicate that Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation ratings correlate well with measured Lysholm scores in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation provides clinicians with an alternative mechanism to gather outcomes data with little demand on time and resources.

Citing Articles

The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Aerobic Fitness, and Traditional Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Injuries in Military Training: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Kreisel B, Scott K, Florkiewicz E, Crowell M, Morris J, McHenry P Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025; 20(1):56-70.

PMID: 39758698 PMC: 11698005. DOI: 10.26603/001c.127137.


Concurrent validity of the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation and hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures.

Bergman E, Mulligan E, Patel R, Wells J Bone Jt Open. 2024; 5(10):904-910.

PMID: 39419510 PMC: 11486539. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0094.R1.


Comparison of a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Method and the Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 for Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.

Gebhardt S, Flugel J, Wassilew G, Balcarek P Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(10):23259671241265836.

PMID: 39371573 PMC: 11450582. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241265836.


Considerations of Throwing Athletes With Upper Extremity Injury When Completing the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE): A Report From the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network.

Huxel Bliven K, Bay R, Bay C, Pavelski K, Snyder Valier A J Athl Train. 2024; 60(2):154-160.

PMID: 39288166 PMC: 11866794. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0466.23.


Limited correlation between physical performance and patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Nielsen T, Dalgas U, Lind M J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e12071.

PMID: 39021893 PMC: 11252494. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12071.