» Articles » PMID: 31440444

Denosumab for Bone Health in Prostate and Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Endocrine Therapy? A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Abstract

Hormonal therapies for receptor positive-breast and prostate cancer patients have shown clinical efficacy but also several side effects including osteoporosis, loss of bone mass and increased fracture risk. Denosumab represents an anti RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand) monoclonal anti-body acting as inhibitor of osteoclasts formation, function, and survival, then increasing bone mass. Herein, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the role of Denosumab in saving bone health in prostate and breast cancer patients receiving respectively androgen deprivation therapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Moreover, selected patients have to be treated with Denosumab at the dose of 60 mg every six month or placebo. Outcomes studied included the bone mass density (BMD) increase at 24 and 36 months, BMD loss, reduction of fractures risk (in particular vertebral) at 24 and 36 months and safety (overall, serious adverse events - SAEs and discontinuation rate). Our results showed a reduction of the BMD loss up to 36 months both at the lumbar and femoral level and a BMD increase both at 24 and 36 months. It was also found a reduction in the number of new vertebral and femoral fractures at 24 and 36 months. Finally, our pooled analysis showed that Denosumab did not affect both the SAEs and therapy discontinuation risk. In conclusion, Denosumab administration can be considered effective and safe in the prevention and management of the above mentioned adverse events related to hormonal therapies designed for breast and prostate tumors.

Citing Articles

The Secretome of Parental and Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Elicits Distinct Effects in Human Osteoclast Activity after Activation of β2 Adrenergic Signaling.

Conceicao F, Sousa D, Tojal S, Lourenco C, Carvalho-Maia C, Estevao-Pereira H Biomolecules. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37189370 PMC: 10135909. DOI: 10.3390/biom13040622.


Effectiveness of cognitive-based interventions for improving body image of patients having breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhao W, Chong Y, Chien W Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023; 10(4):100213.

PMID: 37089782 PMC: 10120298. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100213.


Association of sex steroid hormones and new bone formation rate after iliac onlay grafting: a prospective clinical pilot study.

Landwehr V, Fretwurst T, Heinen J, Vach K, Nelson K, Nahles S Int J Implant Dent. 2022; 8(1):53.

PMID: 36376517 PMC: 9663769. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00447-x.


Understanding pain related to adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer: A qualitative report.

Walsh E, Chabria R, Vranceanu A, Park E, Post K, Peppercorn J Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022; 31(6):e13723.

PMID: 36196499 PMC: 9701169. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13723.


Real-world patient-reported outcomes of breast cancer or prostate cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for bone metastases: Final results of the PROBone registry study.

Jakob A, Zahn M, Nusch A, Werner T, Schnell R, Frank M J Bone Oncol. 2022; 33:100420.

PMID: 35340302 PMC: 8941198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100420.


References
1.
Juni P, Altman D, Egger M . Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001; 323(7303):42-6. PMC: 1120670. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42. View

2.
Anderson W, Chatterjee N, Ershler W, Brawley O . Estrogen receptor breast cancer phenotypes in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002; 76(1):27-36. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020299707510. View

3.
Hillner B, Ingle J, Chlebowski R, Gralow J, Yee G, Janjan N . American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(21):4042-57. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.017. View

4.
Roehl K, Han M, Ramos C, Antenor J, Catalona W . Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004; 172(3):910-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb. View

5.
Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P . Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55(2):74-108. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. View