» Articles » PMID: 21056534

EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Nov 9
PMID 21056534
Citations 503
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised cancer of the prostate (PCa).

Methods: The working panel performed a literature review of the new data emerging from 2007 to 2010. The guidelines were updated, and level of evidence and grade of recommendation were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature, which included a search of online databases and bibliographic reviews.

Results: A full version is available at the EAU office or Web site (www.uroweb.org). Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population-based screening by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for PCa. A systematic prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and local anaesthesia is the preferred diagnostic method. Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy. PSA doubling time in <3 yr or a biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention. In men with locally advanced PCa in whom local therapy is not mandatory, watchful waiting (WW) is a treatment alternative to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with equivalent oncologic efficacy. Active treatment is mostly recommended for patients with localised disease and a long life expectancy with radical prostatectomy (RP) shown to be superior to WW in a prospective randomised trial. Nerve-sparing RP represents the approach of choice in organ-confined disease; neoadjuvant androgen deprivation demonstrates no improvement of outcome variables. Radiation therapy should be performed with at least 74 Gy and 78 Gy in low-risk and intermediate/high-risk PCa, respectively. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior disease-specific and overall survival rates and represents the treatment of choice. Follow-up after local therapy is largely based on PSA, and a disease-specific history with imaging is indicated only when symptoms occur.

Conclusions: The knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing. These EAU guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and put them into clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence-assisted enhancement of prostate volume metrics in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Zhang Y, He S, Chen J, Liu G, Luo Y, Song Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(2):1641-1652.

PMID: 39995717 PMC: 11847177. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1015.


Radical Prostatectomy Survivorship: What Are We Really Asking?.

Merrett C, Yim A, Ong X, Silagy B, Al-Khanaty A, Stokes D Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72744.

PMID: 39618609 PMC: 11607558. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72744.


NOSTRIN is involved in benign prostatic hyperplasia via inhibition of proliferation, oxidative stress, and inflammation in prostate epithelial cells.

Li S, Yu C, Xiao H, Xu Q, Gao B, Guo L Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(9):2055-2069.

PMID: 39434759 PMC: 11491235. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-209.


Evaluating Prostate Cancer: The Diagnostic Impact of MRI and Its Relationship With Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)-Guided Biopsy.

Ahmed M, Kaushik J, Yogesh S, Subburam S, Raja D, Thinakaran S Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69380.

PMID: 39411624 PMC: 11473209. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69380.


Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automatic Classification of Colorectal and Prostate Tumor Biopsies Using Multispectral Imagery: System Development Study.

Peyret R, AlSaeed D, Khelifi F, Al-Ghreimil N, Al-Baity H, Bouridane A JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024; 3(1):e27394.

PMID: 38935960 PMC: 11135179. DOI: 10.2196/27394.