» Articles » PMID: 31429105

Development of a Stratification Tool to Identify Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Lowest Risk of Progression

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 21
PMID 31429105
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long-term surveillance is low-yield for most individuals.

Aim: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata.

Methods: We combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side-branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high-risk stigmata during follow-up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox-proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal-external validation.

Results: 875 patients were included. After a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 12-157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high-risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95-2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21-3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91-1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort).

Conclusion: In presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch-American Risk stratification Tool (DART-1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata.

Citing Articles

Risk Assessment and Radiomics Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN).

Flammia F, Fusco R, Triggiani S, Pellegrino G, Reginelli A, Simonetti I Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241263644.

PMID: 39293798 PMC: 11412216. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241263644.


Risk Perceptions and Risk Thresholds Among Surgeons in the Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

Sacks G, Shin P, Braithwaite R, Soares K, Kingham T, DAngelica M Ann Surg. 2023; 278(5):e1073-e1079.

PMID: 37796751 PMC: 11265933. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005827.


[Diagnostics and clinical management of premalignant diseases of the pancreas].

Buchholz S, Ammer-Herrmenau C, Ellenrieder V, Neesse A Internist (Berl). 2022; 63(4):401-413.

PMID: 35234978 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-022-01308-w.


International external validation of a stratification tool to identify branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression.

Overbeek K, van Leeuwen N, Tacelli M, Anwar M, Yousaf M, Chhoda A United European Gastroenterol J. 2022; 10(2):169-178.

PMID: 35199484 PMC: 8911544. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12207.


Risk stratification tools for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Balduzzi A, Salvia R, Lohr M United European Gastroenterol J. 2022; 10(2):145-146.

PMID: 35122677 PMC: 8911533. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12205.


References
1.
Lawrence S, Attiyeh M, Seier K, Gonen M, Schattner M, Haviland D . Should Patients With Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas Undergo Long-term Radiographic Surveillance?: Results of 3024 Patients Evaluated at a Single Institution. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(3):536-544. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002371. View

2.
Matthaei H, Wylie D, Lloyd M, Dal Molin M, Kemppainen J, Mayo S . miRNA biomarkers in cyst fluid augment the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(17):4713-24. PMC: 3547600. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0035. View

3.
Buscaglia J, Giday S, Kantsevoy S, Jagannath S, Magno P, Wolfgang C . Patient- and cyst-related factors for improved prediction of malignancy within cystic lesions of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2009; 9(5):631-8. DOI: 10.1159/000181173. View

4.
Collins G, Reitsma J, Altman D, Moons K . Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(3):148-58. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9736. View

5.
Batabyal P, Vander Hoorn S, Christophi C, Nikfarjam M . Association of diabetes mellitus and pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of 88 studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21(7):2453-62. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3625-6. View