» Articles » PMID: 31418128

Structural Variations of Subterminal Satellite Blocks and Their Source Mechanisms As Inferred from the Meiotic Configurations of Chimpanzee Chromosome Termini

Overview
Journal Chromosome Res
Date 2019 Aug 17
PMID 31418128
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

African great apes have large constitutive heterochromatin (C-band) blocks in subtelomeric regions of the majority of their chromosomes, but humans lack these. Additionally, the chimpanzee meiotic cell division process demonstrates unique partial terminal associations in the first meiotic prophase (pachytene). These are likely formed as a result of interaction among subtelomeric C-band blocks. We thus conducted an extensive study to define the features in the subtelomeric heterochromatic regions of chimpanzee chromosomes undergoing mitotic metaphase and meiotic cell division. Molecular cytogenetic analyses with probes of both subterminal satellite DNA (a main component of C-band) and rDNA demonstrated principles of interaction among DNA arrays. The results suggest that homologous and ectopic recombination through persistent subtelomeric associations (post-bouquet association observed in 32% of spermatocytes in the pachytene stage) appears to create variability in heterochromatin patterns and simultaneously restrain subtelomeric genome polymorphisms. That is, the meeting of non-homologous chromosome termini sets the stage for ectopic pairing which, in turn, is the mechanism for generating variability and genomic dispersion of subtelomeric C-band blocks through a system of concerted evolution. Comparison between the present study and previous reports indicated that the chromosomal distribution rate of sutelomeric regions seems to have antagonistic correlation with arm numbers holding subterminal satellite blocks in humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. That is, the increase of subterminal satellite blocks probably reduces genomic diversity in the subtelomeric regions. The acquisition vs. loss of the subtelomeric C-band blocks is postulated as the underlying engine of this chromosomal differentiation yielded by meiotic chromosomal interaction.

Citing Articles

Complete sequencing of ape genomes.

Yoo D, Rhie A, Hebbar P, Antonacci F, Logsdon G, Solar S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131277 PMC: 11312596. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.31.605654.


The different subtelomeric structure among 1RS arms in wheat-rye 1BL.1RS translocations affecting their meiotic recombination and inducing their structural variation.

Xiong Z, Luo J, Zou Y, Tang Q, Fu S, Tang Z BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):455.

PMID: 37568100 PMC: 10416389. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09525-9.


Differences between human and chimpanzee genomes and their implications in gene expression, protein functions and biochemical properties of the two species.

Suntsova M, Buzdin A BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(Suppl 7):535.

PMID: 32912141 PMC: 7488140. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-06962-8.


Chromosome Dynamics Regulating Genomic Dispersion and Alteration of Nucleolus Organizer Regions (NORs).

Hirai H Cells. 2020; 9(4).

PMID: 32326514 PMC: 7227013. DOI: 10.3390/cells9040971.

References
1.
Luke S, Verma R . Origin of human chromosome 2. Nat Genet. 1992; 2(1):11-2. DOI: 10.1038/ng0992-11. View

2.
Schmid M, Krone W, Vogel W . On the relationship between the frequency of association and the nucleolar constriction of individual acrocentric chromosomes. Humangenetik. 1974; 23(4):267-77. DOI: 10.1007/BF00272510. View

3.
Hirai H, Taguchi T, Godwin A . Genomic differentiation of 18S ribosomal DNA and beta-satellite DNA in the hominoid and its evolutionary aspects. Chromosome Res. 1999; 7(7):531-40. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009237412155. View

4.
Arnheim N, Krystal M, Schmickel R, Wilson G, Ryder O, Zimmer E . Molecular evidence for genetic exchanges among ribosomal genes on nonhomologous chromosomes in man and apes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980; 77(12):7323-7. PMC: 350495. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7323. View

5.
Janssen A, Colmenares S, Karpen G . Heterochromatin: Guardian of the Genome. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2018; 34:265-288. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062653. View