» Articles » PMID: 32326514

Chromosome Dynamics Regulating Genomic Dispersion and Alteration of Nucleolus Organizer Regions (NORs)

Overview
Journal Cells
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Apr 25
PMID 32326514
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) demonstrate differences in genomic dispersion and transcriptional activity among all organisms. I postulate that such differences stem from distinct genomic structures and their interactions from chromosome observations using fluorescence in situ hybridization and silver nitrate staining methods. Examples in primates and Australian bulldog ants indicate that chromosomal features indeed play a significant role in determining the properties of NORs. In primates, rDNA arrays that are located on the short arm of acrocentrics frequently form reciprocal associations ("affinity"), but they lack such associations ("non-affinity") with other repeat arrays-a binary molecular effect. These "rules" of affinity vs. non-affinity are extrapolated from the chromosomal configurations of meiotic prophase. In bulldog ants, genomic dispersions of rDNA loci expand much more widely following an increase in the number of acrocentric chromosomes formed by centric fission. Affinity appears to be a significantly greater force: associations likely form among rDNA and heterochromatin arrays of acrocentrics-thus, more acrocentrics bring about more rDNA loci. The specific interactions among NOR-related genome structures remain unclear and require further investigation. Here, I propose that there are limited and non-limited genomic dispersion systems that result from genomic affinity rules, inducing specific chromosomal configurations that are related to NORs.

Citing Articles

Structure and Evolution of Ribosomal Genes of Insect Chromosomes.

Gokhman V, Kuznetsova V Insects. 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39194798 PMC: 11354594. DOI: 10.3390/insects15080593.


Physical chromosomal mapping of major ribosomal genes in 15 ant species with a review of hypotheses regarding evolution of the number and position of NORs in ants.

Damasceno M, Teixeira G, Ferreira P, Lod R, Barros L, de Aguiar H Comp Cytogenet. 2024; 18:105-122.

PMID: 38966326 PMC: 11222723. DOI: 10.3897/compcytogen.18.125235.


High Chromosomal Reorganization and Presence of Microchromosomes in Chactidae Scorpions from the Brazilian Amazon.

Almeida B, Malcher S, Costa M, Martins J, Procopio R, Noronha R Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37106763 PMC: 10135684. DOI: 10.3390/biology12040563.


Reconstruction of the Doradinae (Siluriformes-Doradidae) ancestral diploid number and NOR pattern reveals new insights about the karyotypic diversification of the Neotropical thorny catfishes.

Takagui F, Viana P, Baumgartner L, Bitencourt J, Margarido V, Lui R Genet Mol Biol. 2021; 44(4):e20200068.

PMID: 34821336 PMC: 8612126. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2020-0068.


Repetitive Sequence Distribution on , and Tamarins (Platyrrhine, Primates) by Mapping Telomeric (TTAGGG) Motifs and rDNA Loci.

Ceraulo S, Perelman P, Mazzoleni S, Rovatsos M, Dumas F Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(9).

PMID: 34571721 PMC: 8470041. DOI: 10.3390/biology10090844.


References
1.
Hirai H, Yamamoto M, Ogura K, Satta Y, Yamada M, Taylor R . Multiplication of 28S rDNA and NOR activity in chromosome evolution among ants of the Myrmecia pilosula species complex. Chromosoma. 1994; 103(3):171-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00368009. View

2.
Yunis J, Prakash O . The origin of man: a chromosomal pictorial legacy. Science. 1982; 215(4539):1525-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.7063861. View

3.
Meneveri R, Agresti A, Rocchi M, Marozzi A, Ginelli E . Analysis of GC-rich repetitive nucleotide sequences in great apes. J Mol Evol. 1995; 40(4):405-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00164027. View

4.
Henderson A, Atwood K, Warburton D . Chromosomal distribution of rDNA in Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla beringei, and Symphalangus syndactylus: comparison to related primates. Chromosoma. 1976; 59(2):147-55. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328483. View

5.
Hirai H, Hirai Y . FISH mapping for helminth genome. Methods Mol Biol. 2004; 270:379-94. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-793-9:379. View