» Articles » PMID: 31413274

Assessment of Risk to Hoary Squash Bees (Peponapis Pruinosa) and Other Ground-nesting Bees from Systemic Insecticides in Agricultural Soil

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Aug 16
PMID 31413274
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using the hoary squash bee (Peponapis pruinosa) as a model, we provide the first probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to systemic insecticides in soil for ground-nesting bees. To assess risk in acute and chronic exposure scenarios in Cucurbita and field crops, concentrations of clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid (neonicotinoids) and chlorantraniliprole (anthranilic diamide) in cropped soil were plotted to produce an environmental exposure distribution for each insecticide. The probability of exceedance of several exposure endpoints (LCs) was compared to an acceptable risk threshold (5%). In Cucurbita crops, under acute exposure, risk to hoary squash bees was below 5% for honey bee LCs for all residues evaluated but exceeded 5% for clothianidin and imidacloprid using a solitary bee LC. For Cucurbita crops in the chronic exposure scenario, exposure risks for clothianidin and imidacloprid exceeded 5% for all endpoints, and exposure risk for chlorantraniliprole was below 5% for all endpoints. In field crops, risk to ground-nesting bees was high from clothianidin in all exposure scenarios and high for thiamethoxam and imidacloprid under chronic exposure scenarios. Risk assessments for ground-nesting bees should include exposure impacts from pesticides in soil and could use the hoary squash bee as an ecotoxicology model.

Citing Articles

Exposure of insects to current use pesticide residues in soil and vegetation along spatial and temporal distribution in agricultural sites.

Honert C, Mauser K, Jager U, Bruhl C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1817.

PMID: 39838035 PMC: 11751026. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84811-4.


No impact of cyantraniliprole on the hibernation success of bumble bees () in a soil-mediated laboratory exposure study.

Linguadoca A, Morrison M, Menaballi L, Sima P, Brown M Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70328.

PMID: 39360125 PMC: 11445450. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70328.


Plant versus pollinator protection: balancing pest management against floral contamination for insecticide use in Midwestern US cucurbits.

Hung K, Ternest J, Wood T, Ingwell L, Bloom E, Szendrei Z J Econ Entomol. 2024; 118(1):262-273.

PMID: 39278632 PMC: 11818373. DOI: 10.1093/jee/toae202.


Single and combined exposure to 'bee safe' pesticides alter behaviour and offspring production in a ground-nesting solitary bee ().

Rondeau S, Raine N Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2019):20232939.

PMID: 38503336 PMC: 10950463. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2939.


Route of exposure to veterinary products in bees: Unraveling pasture's impact on avermectin exposure and tolerance in stingless bees.

Obregon D, Guerrero O, Sossa D, Stashenko E, Prada F, Ramirez B PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(3):pgae068.

PMID: 38444603 PMC: 10914370. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae068.


References
1.
Sanchez-Bayo F, Goka K . Pesticide residues and bees--a risk assessment. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94482. PMC: 3981812. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094482. View

2.
Cane J . Adult pollen diet essential for egg maturation by a solitary Osmia bee. J Insect Physiol. 2016; 95:105-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.09.011. View

3.
Arena M, Sgolastra F . A meta-analysis comparing the sensitivity of bees to pesticides. Ecotoxicology. 2014; 23(3):324-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-014-1190-1. View

4.
Rundlof M, Andersson G, Bommarco R, Fries I, Hederstrom V, Herbertsson L . Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature. 2015; 521(7550):77-80. DOI: 10.1038/nature14420. View

5.
Dively G, Kamel A . Insecticide residues in pollen and nectar of a cucurbit crop and their potential exposure to pollinators. J Agric Food Chem. 2012; 60(18):4449-56. DOI: 10.1021/jf205393x. View