» Articles » PMID: 22761727

Movement of Soil-applied Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam into Nectar and Pollen of Squash (Cucurbita Pepo)

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jul 5
PMID 22761727
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been recent interest in the threat to bees posed by the use of systemic insecticides. One concern is that systemic insecticides may translocate from the soil into pollen and nectar of plants, where they would be ingested by pollinators. This paper reports on the movement of two such systemic neonicotinoid insecticides, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, into the pollen and nectar of flowers of squash (Cucurbita pepo cultivars "Multipik," "Sunray" and "Bush Delicata") when applied to soil by two methods: (1) sprayed into soil before seeding, or (2) applied through drip irrigation in a single treatment after transplant. All insecticide treatments were within labeled rates for these compounds. Pollen and nectar samples were analyzed using a standard extraction method widely used for pesticides (QuEChERS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometric analysis. The concentrations found in nectar, 10 ± 3 ppb (mean ± s.d) for imidacloprid and 11 ± 6 ppb for thiamethoxam, are higher than concentrations of neonicotinoid insecticides in nectar of canola and sunflower grown from treated seed, and similar to those found in a recent study of neonicotinoids applied to pumpkins at transplant and through drip irrigation. The concentrations in pollen, 14 ± 8 ppb for imidacloprid and 12 ± 9 ppb for thiamethoxam, are higher than those found for seed treatments in most studies, but at the low end of the range found in the pumpkin study. Our concentrations fall into the range being investigated for sublethal effects on honey bees and bumble bees.

Citing Articles

Hormetic response to pesticides in diapausing bees.

Amsalem E, Derstine N, Murray C Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240612.

PMID: 39837491 PMC: 11750372. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0612.


Plant versus pollinator protection: balancing pest management against floral contamination for insecticide use in Midwestern US cucurbits.

Hung K, Ternest J, Wood T, Ingwell L, Bloom E, Szendrei Z J Econ Entomol. 2024; 118(1):262-273.

PMID: 39278632 PMC: 11818373. DOI: 10.1093/jee/toae202.


Using Pop-GUIDE to Assess the Applicability of MCnest for Relative Risk of Pesticides to Hummingbirds.

Etterson M, Paulukonis E, Purucker S Ecologies (Basel). 2024; 4(1):171-194.

PMID: 39234598 PMC: 11373374. DOI: 10.3390/ecologies4010013.


Temperature and soil moisture manipulation yields evidence of drought-induced pollen limitation in bee-pollinated squash.

Gambel J, Holway D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(6):e11400.

PMID: 38832140 PMC: 11144714. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11400.


Top-down versus bottom-up oxidation of a neonicotinoid pesticide by OH radicals.

Wang X, Wang W, Wingen L, Perraud V, Finlayson-Pitts B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(7):e2312930121.

PMID: 38315860 PMC: 10873643. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2312930121.


References
1.
Shuler R, Roulston T, Farris G . Farming practices influence wild pollinator populations on squash and pumpkin. J Econ Entomol. 2005; 98(3):790-5. DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.790. View

2.
Goulson D, Lye G, Darvill B . Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 53:191-208. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454. View

3.
Cresswell J . A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees. Ecotoxicology. 2010; 20(1):149-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0566-0. View

4.
Dively G, Kamel A . Insecticide residues in pollen and nectar of a cucurbit crop and their potential exposure to pollinators. J Agric Food Chem. 2012; 60(18):4449-56. DOI: 10.1021/jf205393x. View

5.
Pettis J, vanEngelsdorp D, Johnson J, Dively G . Pesticide exposure in honey bees results in increased levels of the gut pathogen Nosema. Naturwissenschaften. 2012; 99(2):153-8. PMC: 3264871. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-011-0881-1. View