» Articles » PMID: 31398281

CytoLyt Fixation Significantly Inhibits MIB1 Immunoreactivity Whereas Alternative Ki-67 Clone 30-9 is Not Susceptible to the Inhibition: Critical Diagnostic Implications

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Aug 10
PMID 31398281
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Ki-67 proliferation marker has multiple diagnostic and prognostic applications. Although several clones to the Ki-67 antigen are commercially available, the MIB1 clone is widely recommended in the surgical pathology literature for neuroendocrine tumors. In our cytopathology practice, we have encountered unexpectedly low MIB1 immunoreactivity in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks (CBs). The current study evaluated the impact of fixatives, CB processing, and immunocytochemical (ICC) procedures on Ki-67 immunoreactivity.

Methods: Test CBs were prepared from freshly resected tumors, and multiple variables in the MIB1 ICC procedure were tested, including CytoLyt versus formalin collection media, MIB1 versus other Ki-67 clones including 30-9, and other variables. MIB1 versus Ki-67 30-9 clones were tested in parallel on CytoLyt-fixed CBs from clinical samples of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

Results: In the test CBs (n = 10), the mean MIB1 labeling index was 10% in CytoLyt versus 47% in formalin (P = .0116), with a mean loss of reactivity in matched CBs of 37% (up to 70%). None of the procedure modifications tested in 223 individual ICC reactions recovered MIB1 reactivity in CytoLyt except for switching to the Ki-67 30-9 antibody. In CytoLyt-fixed SCLC samples (n = 14), the Ki-67 30-9 antibody demonstrated expected ranges of reactivity (mean, 83%; range, 60%-100%), whereas MIB1 demonstrated markedly inhibited labeling (mean, 60%; range, 10%-95%) (P = .0058).

Conclusions: CytoLyt fixation substantially inhibits MIB1 immunoreactivity, whereas the Ki-67 30-9 clone is not susceptible to inhibition. Markedly discrepant MIB1 reactivity may present a pitfall in the diagnosis of SCLC and may lead to the incorrect prognostic stratification of other tumor types. For laboratories using CytoLyt, we recommend using the Ki-67 30-9 antibody rather than the MIB1 antibody.

Citing Articles

Discrepancy of Hans' criteria for clonally related nodal and pericardiac fluid diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with MYD88 L265P mutation.

Terao T, Sato Y, Kuroda Y, Haratake T, Nishimura M, Sato Y J Clin Exp Hematop. 2024; 64(4):318-322.

PMID: 39603634 PMC: 11786154. DOI: 10.3960/jslrt.24050.


Reliability of assessing morphologic features with prognostic significance in cytology specimens of epithelioid diffuse pleural mesothelioma and implications for cytopathology reporting.

Li Y, Salama A, Baine M, Bodd F, Offin M, Rekhtman N Cancer Cytopathol. 2023; 131(8):495-506.

PMID: 37127928 PMC: 11037265. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22705.


Nationwide differences in cytology fixation and processing methods and their impact on interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity.

Koomen B, de Boer M, van Dooijeweert C, van Lindert A, Deckers I, Voorham Q Virchows Arch. 2022; 482(4):707-720.

PMID: 36370167 PMC: 10067664. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03446-w.


Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms: recent progress and persistent challenges.

Rekhtman N Mod Pathol. 2021; 35(Suppl 1):36-50.

PMID: 34663914 PMC: 8695375. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00943-2.


False-negative programmed death-ligand 1 immunostaining in ethanol-fixed endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens of non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Koomen B, Vreuls W, de Boer M, de Ruiter E, Hoelters J, Vink A Histopathology. 2021; 79(4):480-490.

PMID: 33772818 PMC: 8519150. DOI: 10.1111/his.14373.


References
1.
Klimstra D, Modlin I, Coppola D, Lloyd R, Suster S . The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010; 39(6):707-12. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ec124e. View

2.
Matsumoto A, Jinno H, Ando T, Fujii T, Nakamura T, Saito J . Biological markers of invasive breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015; 46(2):99-105. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv153. View

3.
Volante M, Gatti G, Papotti M . Classification of lung neuroendocrine tumors: lights and shadows. Endocrine. 2015; 50(2):315-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-015-0578-x. View

4.
Rindi G, Klimstra D, Abedi-Ardekani B, Asa S, Bosman F, Brambilla E . A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol. 2018; 31(12):1770-1786. PMC: 6265262. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0110-y. View

5.
Sauter J, Ambaye A, Mount S . Increased utilization, verification, and clinical implications of immunocytochemistry: Experience in a northern New England hospital. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015; 43(9):688-95. DOI: 10.1002/dc.23279. View