» Articles » PMID: 31396044

Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation II - An Engineering Perspective

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve (aVNS) is an emerging electroceutical technology in the field of bioelectronic medicine with applications in therapy. Artificial modulation of the afferent vagus nerve - a powerful entrance to the brain - affects a large number of physiological processes implicating interactions between the brain and body. Engineering aspects of aVNS determine its efficiency in application. The relevant safety and regulatory issues need to be appropriately addressed. In particular, modeling acts as a tool for aVNS optimization. The evolution of personalized electroceuticals using novel architectures of the closed-loop aVNS paradigms with biofeedback can be expected to optimally meet therapy needs. For the first time, two international workshops on aVNS have been held in Warsaw and Vienna in 2017 within the scope of EU COST Action "European network for innovative uses of EMFs in biomedical applications (BM1309)." Both workshops focused critically on the driving physiological mechanisms of aVNS, its experimental and clinical studies in animals and humans, aVNS studies, technological advancements, and regulatory barriers. The results of the workshops are covered in two reviews, covering physiological and engineering aspects. The present review summarizes on engineering aspects - a discussion of physiological aspects is provided by our accompanying article (Kaniusas et al., 2019). Both reviews build a reasonable bridge from the rationale of aVNS as a therapeutic tool to current research lines, all of them being highly relevant for the promising aVNS technology to reach the patient.

Citing Articles

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effects on Flavor-Evoked Electroencephalogram and Eye-Blink Rate.

Albayrak S, Aydin B, Ozen G, Yalcin F, Balik M, Yanik H Brain Behav. 2025; 15(3):e70355.

PMID: 40079485 PMC: 11904970. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70355.


Personalized auricular vagus nerve stimulation: beat-to-beat deceleration dominates in systole-gated stimulation during inspiration - a pilot study.

Tischer J, Szeles J, Kaniusas E Front Physiol. 2025; 15():1495868.

PMID: 39835202 PMC: 11743728. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1495868.


Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation as a potential therapy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: modulation of the noradrenergic pathway in the prefrontal lobe.

Zhi J, Zhang S, Huang M, Qin H, Xu H, Chang Q Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1494272.

PMID: 39697776 PMC: 11652481. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1494272.


Vagus nerve electrical stimulation in the recovery of upper limb motor functional impairment after ischemic stroke.

Chen L, Gao H, Wang Z, Gu B, Zhou W, Pang M Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(5):3107-3124.

PMID: 39555282 PMC: 11564590. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10143-8.


Low-frequency auricular vagus nerve stimulation facilitates cerebrospinal fluid influx by promoting vasomotion.

Choi S, Baek I, Lee K, Kim S Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024; 29(1):109-116.

PMID: 39482237 PMC: 11694001. DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.24.266.


References
1.
Nayak S, Bit A, Dey A, Mohapatra B, Pal K . A Review on the Nonlinear Dynamical System Analysis of Electrocardiogram Signal. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018:6920420. PMC: 5954865. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6920420. View

2.
. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 1998; 74(4):494-522. View

3.
Chen M, Yu L, Ouyang F, Liu Q, Wang Z, Wang S . The right side or left side of noninvasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: Based on conventional wisdom or scientific evidence?. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 187:44-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.351. View

4.
Roberts A, Sithole A, Sedghi M, Walker C, Quinn T . Minimal adverse effects profile following implantation of periauricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulators: a retrospective cohort study. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016; 9:389-393. PMC: 5098779. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S107426. View

5.
Sator-Katzenschlager S, Scharbert G, Kozek-Langenecker S, Szeles J, Finster G, Schiesser A . The short- and long-term benefit in chronic low back pain through adjuvant electrical versus manual auricular acupuncture. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98(5):1359-64, table of contents. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000107941.16173.f7. View