» Articles » PMID: 31393982

A Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging Studies on Pain Empathy: Investigating the Role of Visual Information and Observers' Perspective

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 9
PMID 31393982
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Empathy relies on brain systems that support the interaction between an observer's mental state and cues about the others' experience. Beyond the core brain areas typically activated in pain empathy studies (insular and anterior cingulate cortices), the diversity of paradigms used may reveal secondary networks that subserve other more specific processes. A coordinate-based meta-analysis of fMRI experiments on pain empathy was conducted to obtain activation likelihood estimates along three factors and seven conditions: visual cues (body parts, facial expressions), visuospatial (first-person, thirdperson), and cognitive (self-, stimuli-, other-oriented tasks) perspectives. The core network was found across cues and perspectives, and common activation was observed in higher-order visual areas. Body-parts distinctly activated areas related with sensorimotor processing (superior and inferior parietal lobules, anterior insula) while facial expression distinctly involved the inferior frontal gyrus. Self- compared to other-perspective produced distinct activations in the left insula while stimulus- versus other-perspective produced distinctive responses in the inferior frontal and parietal lobules, precentral gyrus, and cerebellum. Pain empathy relies on a core network which is modulated by several secondary networks. The involvement of the latter seems to depend on the visual cues available and the observer's mental state that can be influenced by specific instructions.

Citing Articles

Impact of Spinal Manipulative Therapy on Brain Function and Pain Alleviation in Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Resting-State fMRI Study.

Zhou X, Wu S, Wang K, Chen L, Wei Z, Li T Chin J Integr Med. 2024; 31(2):108-117.

PMID: 39707137 DOI: 10.1007/s11655-024-4205-7.


Parietofrontal Networks Mediate Contextual Influences in the Appraisal of Pain and Disgust Facial Expressions.

Dirupo G, Di Paolo V, Lettry E, Schwab K, Corradi-DellAcqua C J Neurosci. 2024; 45(4.

PMID: 39586686 PMC: 11756627. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2233-23.2024.


Stress-induced cortisol response predicts empathy for pain: The role of task-based connectivity between the insula and sensorimotor cortex during acute stress.

Tang Z, Liu Y, Zhao X, Hu W, Zhang M, Ren Y Neurobiol Stress. 2024; 33:100682.

PMID: 39502834 PMC: 11536065. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100682.


Endogenous opioid receptor system mediates costly altruism in the human brain.

Chen J, Putkinen V, Seppala K, Hirvonen J, Ioumpa K, Gazzola V Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1401.

PMID: 39462097 PMC: 11513155. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07084-7.


Neural mechanisms of altruistic decision-making: EEG functional connectivity network analysis.

Mitiureva D, Terlichenko E, Zubko V, Kabanova P, Abrosimova V, Skripkina S Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(6):1109-1120.

PMID: 39198301 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01214-8.


References
1.
Lamm C, Decety J . Is the extrastriate body area (EBA) sensitive to the perception of pain in others?. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18(10):2369-73. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn006. View

2.
Seara-Cardoso A, Viding E, Lickley R, Sebastian C . Neural responses to others' pain vary with psychopathic traits in healthy adult males. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015; 15(3):578-88. PMC: 4526584. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0346-7. View

3.
Ma Y, Wang C, Han S . Neural responses to perceived pain in others predict real-life monetary donations in different socioeconomic contexts. Neuroimage. 2011; 57(3):1273-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.003. View

4.
Uddin L . Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 16(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3857. View

5.
Qiao-Tasserit E, Corradi-DellAcqua C, Vuilleumier P . The good, the bad, and the suffering. Transient emotional episodes modulate the neural circuits of pain and empathy. Neuropsychologia. 2017; 116(Pt A):99-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.027. View