» Articles » PMID: 19199417

How Do We Empathize with Someone Who is Not Like Us? A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Feb 10
PMID 19199417
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research on the neural underpinnings of empathy has been limited to affective situations experienced in a similar way by an observer and a target individual. In daily life we also interact with people whose responses to affective stimuli can be very different from our own. How do we understand the affective states of these individuals? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess how participants empathize with the feelings of patients who reacted with no pain to surgical procedures but with pain to a soft touch. Empathy for pain of these patients activated the same areas (insula, medial/anterior cingulate cortex) as empathy for persons who responded to painful stimuli in the same way as the observer. Empathy in a situation that was aversive only for the observer but neutral for the patient recruited areas involved in self-other distinction (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) and cognitive control (right inferior frontal cortex). In addition, effective connectivity between the latter and areas implicated in affective processing was enhanced. This suggests that inferring the affective state of someone who is not like us can rely upon the same neural structures as empathy for someone who is similar to us. When strong emotional response tendencies exist though, these tendencies have to be overcome by executive functions. Our results demonstrate that the fronto-cortical attention network is crucially involved in this process, corroborating that empathy is a flexible phenomenon which involves both automatic and controlled cognitive mechanisms. Our findings have important implications for the understanding and promotion of empathy, demonstrating that regulation of one's egocentric perspective is crucial for understanding others.

Citing Articles

Neural empathy mechanisms are shared for physical and social pain, and increase from adolescence to older adulthood.

Ferguson H, De Lillo M, Woodrow-Hill C, Foley R, Bradford E Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 39492751 PMC: 11630255. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae080.


Connected in Bad Times and in Good Times: Empathy Induces Stable Social Closeness.

Saulin A, Ting C, Engelmann J, Hein G J Neurosci. 2024; 44(23).

PMID: 38684367 PMC: 11154854. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1108-23.2024.


Altered empathy processing in frontotemporal dementia A task-based fMRI study.

Lindberg O, Li T, Lind C, Vestberg S, Almkvist O, Stiernstedt M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38585830 PMC: 10996471. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586051.


Social Understanding beyond the Familiar: Disparity in Visual Abilities Does Not Impede Empathy and Theory of Mind.

Landmann E, Krahmer A, Bockler A J Intell. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38248900 PMC: 10816830. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence12010002.


Resting-state connectivity underlying cognitive control's association with perspective taking in callous-unemotional traits.

Winters D, Leopold D, Carter R, Sakai J Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2023; 331:111615.

PMID: 36924739 PMC: 10133184. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111615.