» Articles » PMID: 31392530

Long-term Outcomes of Biological Mesh Repair Following Extra Levator Abdominoperineal Excision Of the Rectum: an Observational Study of 100 Patients

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 9
PMID 31392530
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current evidence suggests that pelvic floor reconstruction following extralevator abdominoperineal excision of rectum (ELAPER) may reduce the risk of perineal herniation of intra-abdominal contents. Options for reconstruction include mesh and myocutaneous flaps, for which long-term follow-up data is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of biological mesh (Surgisis, Biodesign™) reconstruction following ELAPER.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients having ELAPER in a single institution between 2008 and 2018 was perfomed. Clinic letters were scrutinised for wound complications and all available cross sectional imaging was reviewed to identify evidence of perineal herniation (defined as presence of intra-abdominal content below a line between the coccyx and the lower margin of the pubic symphysis on sagittal view).

Results: One hundred patients were identified (median age 66, IQR 59-72 years, 70% male). Median length of follow-up was 4.9 years (IQR 2.3-6.7 years). One, 2- and 5-year mortality rates were 3, 8 and 12%, respectively. Thirty three perineal wounds had not healed by 1 month, but no mesh was infected and no mesh needed to be removed. Only one patient developed a symptomatic perineal hernia requiring repair. On review of imaging a further 7 asymptomatic perineal hernias were detected. At 4 years the cumulative radiologically detected perineal hernia rate was 8%.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that pelvic floor reconstruction using biological mesh following ELAPER is both safe and effective as a long-term solution, with low major complication rates. Symptomatic perineal herniation is rare following mesh reconstruction, but may develop sub clinically and be detectable on cross-sectional imaging.

Citing Articles

Personalized Decisional Algorithms for Soft Tissue Defect Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection for Low-Lying Rectal Cancers.

Moraru D, Pertea M, Luca S, Bejan V, Panuta A, Tatar R Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(6):3253-3268.

PMID: 38920730 PMC: 11202520. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060247.


Extracellular Matrix Scaffold-Assisted Tumor Vaccines Induce Tumor Regression and Long-Term Immune Memory.

Pal S, Chaudhari R, Baurceanu I, Hill B, Nagy B, Wolf M Adv Mater. 2024; 36(15):e2309843.

PMID: 38302823 PMC: 11009079. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202309843.


A comparison of surgical techniques for perineal wound closure following perineal excision: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Riva C, Kelly M, Vitellaro M, Rottoli M, Aiolfi A, Ferrari D Tech Coloproctol. 2023; 27(12):1351-1366.

PMID: 37843643 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02868-1.


Short- and mid-term outcomes of abdominoperineal resection with perineal mesh insertion: a single-centre experience.

Gendia A, Rehman M, Lin C, Malik K, Khalil K, Ihedioha U Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):220.

PMID: 37606697 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04507-5.


Perineal wound complications after vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and mesh closure following abdominoperineal surgery and pelvic exenteration of anal and rectal cancers: A meta-analysis.

Liu J, Fu C, Chen Z, Li G Int Wound J. 2023; 20(10):3963-3973.

PMID: 37539486 PMC: 10681467. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14284.


References
1.
Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold H, Soreide O . Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47(1):48-58. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y. View

2.
Eriksen M, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig J . Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(2):210-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4390. View

3.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

4.
Bullard K, Trudel J, Baxter N, Rothenberger D . Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48(3):438-43. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0827-1. View

5.
Konstantinovic M, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken E, Ridder D, Deprest J . Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG. 2005; 112(11):1554-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00688.x. View