» Articles » PMID: 31383766

The Causal Role of α-oscillations in Feature Binding

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Aug 7
PMID 31383766
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The binding problem-how to integrate features into objects-poses a fundamental challenge for the brain. Neural oscillations, especially γ-oscillations, have been proposed as a potential mechanism to solve this problem. However, since γ-oscillations usually reflect local neural activity, how to implement feature binding involving a large-scale brain network remains largely unknown. Here, combining electroencephalogram (EEG) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), we employed a bistable color-motion binding stimulus to probe the role of neural oscillations in feature binding. Subjects' perception of the stimulus switched between its physical binding and its illusory (active) binding. The active binding has been shown to involve a large-scale network consisting of spatially distant brain areas. α-Oscillations presumably reflect the dynamics of such large-scale networks, especially due to volume conduction effects in EEG. We found that, relative to the physical binding, the α-power decreased during the active binding. Additionally, individual α-power was negatively correlated with the time proportion of the active binding. Subjects' perceptual switch rate between the 2 bindings was positively correlated with their individual α-frequency. Furthermore, applying tACS at individual α-frequency decreased the time proportion of the active binding. Moreover, delivering tACS at different temporal frequencies in the α-band changed subjects' perceptual switch rate through affecting the active binding process. Our findings provide converging evidence for the causal role of α-oscillations in feature binding, especially in active feature binding, thereby uncovering a function of α-oscillations in human cognition.

Citing Articles

Interactions between the fovea and the periphery shape misbinding of visual features in a continuous report paradigm.

Crayen M, Treue S, Esghaei M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28381.

PMID: 39551785 PMC: 11570667. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78867-5.


Peak alpha frequency is linked to visual temporal attention in 6-month-olds.

Arioli M, Mattersberger M, Hoehl S, Brzozowska A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28173.

PMID: 39548193 PMC: 11568323. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79129-0.


Visual Processing by Hierarchical and Dynamic Multiplexing.

Bonnefond M, Jensen O, Clausner T eNeuro. 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39537353 PMC: 11574700. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0282-24.2024.


Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases Nontarget Retrieval during Visual Working Memory.

Ye S, Wu M, Yao C, Xue G, Cai Y eNeuro. 2024; 11(11.

PMID: 39500573 PMC: 11697231. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024.


Distinct oscillatory patterns differentiate between segregation and integration processes in perceptual grouping.

Costa G, Schaum M, Duarte J, Martins R, Duarte I, Castelhano J Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(12):e26779.

PMID: 39185735 PMC: 11345702. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26779.


References
1.
BERTRAND . Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999; 3(4):151-162. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01299-1. View

2.
Singer W . Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations?. Neuron. 2000; 24(1):49-65, 111-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1. View

3.
von Stein A, Sarnthein J . Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000; 38(3):301-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00172-0. View

4.
von Stein A, Chiang C, Konig P . Top-down processing mediated by interareal synchronization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(26):14748-53. PMC: 18990. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14748. View

5.
Holcombe A, Cavanagh P . Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(2):127-8. DOI: 10.1038/83945. View