» Articles » PMID: 31371569

High-precision Plasma β-amyloid 42/40 Predicts Current and Future Brain Amyloidosis

Overview
Journal Neurology
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Aug 3
PMID 31371569
Citations 397
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We examined whether plasma β-amyloid (Aβ)42/Aβ40, as measured by a high-precision assay, accurately diagnosed brain amyloidosis using amyloid PET or CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 as reference standards.

Methods: Using an immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay, we measured Aβ42/Aβ40 in plasma and CSF samples from 158 mostly cognitively normal individuals that were collected within 18 months of an amyloid PET scan.

Results: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had a high correspondence with amyloid PET status (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.93) and CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92). The combination of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, age, and ε4 status had a very high correspondence with amyloid PET (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). Individuals with a negative amyloid PET scan at baseline and a positive plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (<0.1218) had a 15-fold greater risk of conversion to amyloid PET-positive compared to individuals with a negative plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ( = 0.01).

Conclusions: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, especially when combined with age and ε4 status, accurately diagnoses brain amyloidosis and can be used to screen cognitively normal individuals for brain amyloidosis. Individuals with a negative amyloid PET scan and positive plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 are at increased risk for converting to amyloid PET-positive. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 could be used in prevention trials to screen for individuals likely to be amyloid PET-positive and at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia.

Classification Of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 levels accurately determine amyloid PET status in cognitively normal research participants.

Citing Articles

Alzheimer's disease neuropathology and its estimation with fluid and imaging biomarkers.

Thal D, Poesen K, Vandenberghe R, De Meyer S Mol Neurodegener. 2025; 20(1):33.

PMID: 40087672 DOI: 10.1186/s13024-025-00819-y.


Blood-based biomarker prescreening with different testing combinations and cutoffs: A simulation study examining efficacy and cost-effectiveness in Alzheimer's disease prevention studies.

Sato K, Niimi Y, Ihara R, Iwata A, Suzuki K, Iwatsubo T Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025; 11(1):e70065.

PMID: 40065919 PMC: 11891560. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.70065.


Plasma biomarkers for diagnosis and differentiation and their cognitive correlations in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Sun W, Ye S, Wang Y, Chen H, Che P, Chen J Brain Commun. 2025; 7(2):fcaf094.

PMID: 40046335 PMC: 11881799. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf094.


Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

Leuzy A, Bollack A, Pellegrino D, Teunissen C, La Joie R, Rabinovici G Alzheimers Dement. 2025; 21(3):e14528.

PMID: 40042435 PMC: 11881640. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14528.


A head-to-head comparison of plasma biomarkers to detect Alzheimer's disease in a memory clinic.

Anastasi F, Fernandez-Lebrero A, Ashton N, Ortiz-Romero P, Torres-Torronteras J, Gonzalez-Escalante A Alzheimers Dement. 2025; 21(2):e14609.

PMID: 39998475 PMC: 11852974. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14609.


References
1.
Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Ohrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M . CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15(7):673-684. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00070-3. View

2.
Sperling R, Rentz D, Johnson K, Karlawish J, Donohue M, Salmon D . The A4 study: stopping AD before symptoms begin?. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(228):228fs13. PMC: 4049292. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007941. View

3.
Toledo J, Shaw L, Trojanowski J . Plasma amyloid beta measurements - a desired but elusive Alzheimer's disease biomarker. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013; 5(2):8. PMC: 3706955. DOI: 10.1186/alzrt162. View

4.
Gross R, Johnston K . Levels of evidence: Taking Neurology to the next level. Neurology. 2009; 72(1):8-10. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000342200.58823.6a. View

5.
Su Y, Blazey T, Snyder A, Raichle M, Marcus D, Ances B . Partial volume correction in quantitative amyloid imaging. Neuroimage. 2014; 107:55-64. PMC: 4300252. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.058. View