» Articles » PMID: 31366369

Infection and Transmission of Cache Valley Virus by Aedes Albopictus and Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Aug 2
PMID 31366369
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cache Valley virus (CVV; Bunyavirales, Peribunyaviridae) is a mosquito-borne arbovirus endemic in North America. Although severe diseases are mainly observed in pregnant ruminants, CVV has also been recognized as a zoonotic pathogen that can cause fatal encephalitis in humans. Human exposures to CVV and its related subtypes occur frequently under different ecological conditions in the New World; however, neurotropic disease is rarely reported. High prevalence rates of neutralizing antibodies have been detected among residents in several Latin American cities. However, zoophilic mosquito species involved in the enzootic transmission are unlikely to be responsible for the transmission leading to human exposures to CVV. Mechanisms that lead to frequent human exposures to CVV remain largely unknown. In this study, competence of two anthropophilic mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti, for CVV was determined using per os infection to determine if these species could play a role in the transmission of CVV in the domestic and peridomestic settings of urban and suburban areas.

Results: Aedes albopictus were highly susceptible to CVV whereas infection of Ae. aegypti occurred at a significantly lower frequency. Whilst the dissemination rates of CVV were comparable in the two species, the relatively long period to attain maximal infectious titer in Ae. aegypti demonstrated a significant difference in the replication kinetics of CVV in these species. Detection of viral RNA in saliva suggests that both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti are competent vectors for CVV under laboratory conditions.

Conclusions: Differential susceptibility to CVV was observed in Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, reflecting their relatively different capacities for vectoring CVV in nature. The high susceptibility of Ae. albopictus to CVV observed in this study suggests its potential role as an efficient vector for CVV. Complemented by the reports of multiple CVV isolates derived from Ae. albopictus, our finding provides the basis for how the dispersal of Ae. albopictus across the New World may have a significant impact on the transmission and ecology of CVV.

Citing Articles

Ecology and geography of Cache Valley virus assessed using ecological niche modeling.

Muller J, Lopez K, Escobar L, Auguste A Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):270.

PMID: 38926834 PMC: 11210180. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06344-z.


Exploring the transmission modalities of Bunyamwera virus.

Turner E, Christofferson R Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2024; 249:10114.

PMID: 38510492 PMC: 10954195. DOI: 10.3389/ebm.2024.10114.


Replication Kinetics of a Candidate Live-Attenuated Vaccine for Cache Valley Virus in .

Ayers V, Huang Y, Dunlop J, Kohl A, Brennan B, Higgs S Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2022; 22(11):553-558.

PMID: 36354965 PMC: 9700352. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0053.


Vector competence and immune response of Aedes aegypti for Ebinur Lake virus, a newly classified mosquito-borne orthobunyavirus.

Yang C, Wang F, Huang D, Ma H, Zhao L, Zhang G PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022; 16(7):e0010642.

PMID: 35849620 PMC: 9333442. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010642.


Vector competence of Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Aedes albopictus for genetically distinct Jamestown Canyon virus strains circulating in the Northeast United States.

Dieme C, Kramer L, Ciota A Parasit Vectors. 2022; 15(1):226.

PMID: 35739573 PMC: 9229909. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05342-3.


References
1.
Campbell G, REEVES W, Hardy J, Eldridge B . Seroepidemiology of California and Bunyamwera serogroup bunyavirus infections in humans in California. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 136(3):308-19. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116496. View

2.
Holden P, Hess A . Cache Valley virus, a previously undescribed mosquito-borne agent. Science. 1959; 130(3383):1187-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.130.3383.1187. View

3.
Shone S, Glass G, Norris D . Targeted trapping of mosquito vectors in the Chesapeake Bay area of Maryland. J Med Entomol. 2006; 43(2):151-8. PMC: 4152323. DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0151:ttomvi]2.0.co;2. View

4.
Almiron W, Asis R . [Abundance indices of larvae and pupae of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Córdoba City]. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2006; 60(1):37-41. View

5.
Hughes M, Gonzalez J, Reagan K, Blair C, Beaty B . Comparative potential of Aedes triseriatus, Aedes albopictus, and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to transovarially transmit La Crosse virus. J Med Entomol. 2006; 43(4):757-61. DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[757:cpoata]2.0.co;2. View