» Articles » PMID: 31363878

Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Low Tube Voltage Coronary CT Angiography with Isotonic Low-concentration Contrast Agent

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Aug 1
PMID 31363878
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective study evaluated the image quality and accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), in which CCTA used adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) with a low tube voltage and low concentration of isotonic contrast agent. Sixty-eight consecutive patients with AF and suspected CAD were equally and randomly apportioned to two groups and underwent CCTA. In the experimental group, the contrast agent was iodixanol (270 mg I/mL), patients were scanned with 100 kV, and reconstruction was by AIDR. In the conventional scanning (control) group, the contrast agent was iopromide (370 mg I/mL), patients were scanned with 120 kV, and reconstruction was by filtered back projection. The image quality, effective radiation dose (E), and total iodine intake of the groups were compared. Thirty-nine patients with coronary artery stenosis later were given invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The groups were similar with regard to mean CT value, noise, and signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. The figure of merit of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, while the E and total iodine were significantly lower. Using ICA as the diagnostic reference, the groups shared similar sensitivity, specificity, and false positive and false negative rates for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. For determining CAD in patients with AF, CCTA with isotonic low-concentration contrast agent and low-voltage scanning is a feasible alternative that improves accuracy and reduces radiation dose and iodine intake.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Reiber J, Pereira G, Dallan L, Bezerra H, De Sutter J, Stillman A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 36(5):769-787.

PMID: 32281010 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01845-1.

References
1.
Oda S, Honda K, Yoshimura A, Katahira K, Noda K, Oshima S . 256-Slice coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: optimal reconstruction phase and image quality. Eur Radiol. 2015; 26(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3822-0. View

2.
Slovis T . The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality?. Radiology. 2002; 223(1):5-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2231012100. View

3.
Moscariello A, Takx R, Schoepf U, Renker M, Zwerner P, OBrien T . Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(10):2130-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2164-9. View

4.
Rybicki F, Otero H, Steigner M, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D . Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 24(5):535-46. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-008-9308-2. View

5.
Xue X, Jiang L, Duenninger E, Muenzel M, Guan S, Fazakas A . Impact of chronic kidney disease on Watchman implantation: experience with 300 consecutive left atrial appendage closures at a single center. Heart Vessels. 2018; 33(9):1068-1075. PMC: 6096728. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-018-1157-x. View