» Articles » PMID: 31360830

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Reducing Mastectomy for Women With Breast Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jul 31
PMID 31360830
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer reduced mastectomy rates by 7% to 13% in randomized trials. However, the differential effects for women with different stages, receptor subtypes, and ages are unknown. We compared mastectomy rates in women who did vs did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 18 patient subgroups. The main objective was to quantify the potential benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in reducing mastectomy rates for each subgroup.

Methods: Our retrospective analysis used data from the National Cancer Data Base, which includes approximately 70% of incident cancers across the United States. Absolute risk reductions for mastectomy were determined for 18 subgroups of clinical stage, receptor subtype, and age group. In each subgroup, propensity score weighting balanced measured covariates between women treated with vs without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: A total of 55 709 patients were analyzed. In clinical stage IIA disease, only patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors had reduced mastectomy rates associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (age < 60 years, 12%; age ≥ 60 years, 12.6%). For stage IIB cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an absolute reduction in mastectomy rates of 5.9% in women younger than age 60 years with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- disease, 8.2% to 10.7% for triple-negative disease, and 11.7% to 17.4% for HER2+ disease. For stage IIIA, the reductions in mastectomy rates ranged from 6.6% to 15.9%.

Conclusions: In an analysis of patients treated across the United States, we found that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in mastectomy rates to a similar magnitude overall as shown in randomized trials, but this benefit varied widely by patient subgroup. This study provides novel information to help women make informed decisions regarding treatment.

Citing Articles

Mammographic density in relation to breast cancer recurrence and survival in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Zdanowski A, Sartor H, Feldt M, Skarping I Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1177310.

PMID: 37388229 PMC: 10304818. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1177310.

References
1.
van der Hage J, van de Velde C, Julien J, Tubiana-Hulin M, Vandervelden C, Duchateau L . Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(22):4224-37. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.22.4224. View

2.
Sato T, Matsuyama Y . Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization. Epidemiology. 2003; 14(6):680-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000081989.82616.7d. View

3.
Romanek K, McCaul K, Sandgren A . Age differences in treatment decision making for breast cancer in a sample of healthy women: the effects of body image and risk framing. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005; 32(4):799-806. DOI: 10.1188/05.ONF.799-806. View

4.
Wright J, Bouma S, Dayes I, Sussman J, Simunovic M, Levine M . The importance of reporting patient recruitment details in phase III trials. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(6):843-5. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6005. View

5.
Sturmer T, Rothman K, Glynn R . Insights into different results from different causal contrasts in the presence of effect-measure modification. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006; 15(10):698-709. PMC: 1581494. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1231. View