» Articles » PMID: 11709566

Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer: Results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2001 Nov 16
PMID 11709566
Citations 332
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer results in better overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival rates and whether preoperative chemotherapy permits more breast-conserving surgery procedures than postoperative chemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: Six hundred ninety-eight breast cancer patients (T1c, T2, T3, T4b, N0 to 1, and M0) were enrolled onto a randomized phase III trial that compared four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide administered preoperatively versus the same regimen administered postoperatively (the first cycle administered within 36 hours after surgery). Patients were followed up for OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional recurrence (LRR).

Results: At a median follow-up of 56 months, there was no significant difference in terms of OS (hazards ratio, 1.16; P =.38), PFS (hazards ratio, 1.15; P =.27), and time to LRR (hazards ratio, 1.13; P =.61). Fifty-seven patients (23%) were downstaged by the preoperative chemotherapy, whereas 14 patients (18%) underwent mastectomy and not the planned breast-conserving therapy.

Conclusion: The use of preoperative chemotherapy yields similar results in terms of PFS, OS, and locoregional control compared with conventional postoperative chemotherapy. In addition, preoperative chemotherapy enables more patients to be treated with breast-conserving surgery. Because preoperative chemotherapy does not improve disease outcome compared with postoperative chemotherapy, future trials should involve quality-of-life studies to investigate whether patients will benefit from this treatment modality.

Citing Articles

Comparative survival outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients with T1c, node-negative, triple-negative breast cancer: A population-based analysis.

Zheng Y, Ying J, Wu T, Su Y, Wang O Breast. 2025; 79:103877.

PMID: 39842182 PMC: 11788767. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.103877.


Triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: single institution experience.

Bocian A, Macek P, Kedzierawski P Prz Menopauzalny. 2025; 23(4):192-199.

PMID: 39811390 PMC: 11726194. DOI: 10.5114/pm.2024.145951.


Predictive factors for complete pathologic response in luminal breast cancer: impact of ki67 and HER2 low expression.

Miras I, Gil A, Benavent M, Castilla M, Vieites B, Dominguez-Cejudo M Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241309169.

PMID: 39734711 PMC: 11672595. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241309169.


Identifying subgroups of ypN1 breast cancer patients who may exempt from axillary lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: insights from a large cohort study.

Liu P, Liu D, Zhao C, Wei Y, Liu X, Cui H Breast Cancer. 2024; 32(2):369-384.

PMID: 39729291 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01663-6.


The Impact of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Ghasemi F, Brackstone M Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6007-6016.

PMID: 39451752 PMC: 11505903. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100448.