» Articles » PMID: 31358828

Catalytically Competent Non-transforming H-RAS Mutant Provides Insight into Molecular Switch Function and GAP-independent GTPase Activity of RAS

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Jul 31
PMID 31358828
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

RAS mutants have been extensively studied as they are associated with development of cancer; however, H-RAS mutant has remained untouched since it does not lead to transformation in the cell. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where structural/dynamical properties of H-RAS have been investigated -in comparison to H-RAS, H-RAS, RAF-RBD-bound and GAP-bound H-RAS- using molecular dynamics simulations (total of 9 μs). We observed remarkable differences in dynamics of Y32. Specifically, it is located far from the nucleotide binding pocket in the catalytically-active GAP-bound H-RAS, whereas it makes close interaction with the nucleotide in signaling-active systems (H-RAS, KRAS4B, RAF-RBD-bound H-RAS) and H-RAS. The accessibility of Y32 in wild type protein is achieved upon GAP binding. Interestingly; however, it is intrinsically accessible in H-RAS. Considering the fact that incomplete opening of Y32 is associated with cancer, we propose that Y32 can be targeted by means of small therapeutics that can displace it from the nucleotide binding site, thus introducing intrinsic GTPase activity to RAS mutants, which cannot bind to GAP. Therefore, mimicking properties of H-RAS in RAS-centered drug discovery studies has the potential of improving success rates since it acts as a molecular switch per se.

Citing Articles

Inhibition of mutant RAS-RAF interaction by mimicking structural and dynamic properties of phosphorylated RAS.

Ilter M, Kasmer R, Jalalypour F, Atilgan C, Topcu O, Karakas N Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36458814 PMC: 9762712. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.79747.


Mechanistic insights into the effect of phosphorylation on Ras conformational dynamics and its interactions with cell signaling proteins.

Wang Y, Ji D, Lei C, Chen Y, Qiu Y, Li X Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:1184-1199.

PMID: 33680360 PMC: 7902900. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.044.

References
1.
Crespo P, Leon J . Ras proteins in the control of the cell cycle and cell differentiation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000; 57(11):1613-36. PMC: 11146783. DOI: 10.1007/pl00000645. View

2.
Buhrman G, Holzapfel G, Fetics S, Mattos C . Allosteric modulation of Ras positions Q61 for a direct role in catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(11):4931-6. PMC: 2841912. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912226107. View

3.
Araki M, Shima F, Yoshikawa Y, Muraoka S, Ijiri Y, Nagahara Y . Solution structure of the state 1 conformer of GTP-bound H-Ras protein and distinct dynamic properties between the state 1 and state 2 conformers. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286(45):39644-53. PMC: 3234787. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.227074. View

4.
Sayyed-Ahmad A, Prakash P, Gorfe A . Distinct dynamics and interaction patterns in H- and K-Ras oncogenic P-loop mutants. Proteins. 2017; 85(9):1618-1632. PMC: 5568977. DOI: 10.1002/prot.25317. View

5.
Cox A, Der C . Ras history: The saga continues. Small GTPases. 2011; 1(1):2-27. PMC: 3109476. DOI: 10.4161/sgtp.1.1.12178. View